4th International Young Scientist Congress (IYSC-2018).  International E-publication: Publish Projects, Dissertation, Theses, Books, Souvenir, Conference Proceeding with ISBN.  International E-Bulletin: Information/News regarding: Academics and Research

Molecular barcode analysis and phylogeny of parasitic helminthes: A laboratory manual

Author Affiliations

  • 1Dept. of Biotechnology, M.M. Engineering College, Maharishi Markandeshwar Deemed University Mullana, Ambala-133 207, Haryana, India

Res. J. Recent Sci., Volume 7, Issue (3), Pages 22-27, March,2 (2018)


As all eukaryotic organisms, helminthes also have Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) as hereditary genetic material. The DNA mostly located in the nucleus of cell (nuclear DNA), but a little quantity of DNA can also be found in mitochondria (mitochondrial DNA or mtDNA). DNA of organisms is a unique feature with encoded information which describes all phenotypic and physiological characteristics of bearing animals like barcode of a physical object. Paul Hebert, researcher at the University of Guelph in Ontario, Canada, proposed “DNA barcoding” as a contrivance to identify biological species in 2003. Until now, organisms were identified using morphological characters like shape, size and color of body parts. There was a skilled researcher could make routine observations and microscopically identify specimens using morphological “keys”, but in several cases a learned and eminent taxonomist was considered necessary. When a specimen was mechanically or physically broken or if in an immature stage of development then even experts might not be able to made proper identifications. The validation of taxa was performed to remove ambiguity in identification of cestodes and nematodes by phylogenetic analysis, which was earlier studied by using morphotaxometric analyses. DNA barcoding resolves these ambiguities of morphological identifications because even sub-proficient worker can acquire barcodes from a little amount of tissue. Author wish to explore by the present work about ambiguities in traditionally identified organisms, which can be evaluated and validated by barcoding, phylogeny and molecular heterogeneity, so that individuals may place at appropriate taxonomic status.


  1. Sambrook J., Mac. Callum P. and Rusel D. (2001)., Molecular cloning: A laboratory manual (III ed)., NY Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 2100.
  2. Sambrook J., Fritsch E.F. and Maniatis T. (1989)., Molecular cloning: A laboratory manual (II ed)., NY Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 1659.
  3. Upadhyay S.K. (2012)., Transmission dynamics and environmental influence on food borne parasitic helminthes of the Gangetic plains and central west coast of India., Unpublished D.Phil Thesis. University of Allahabad, India, 400.
  4. Cutillas C., Oliveros R., Rozas M.de and Guevara D.C. (2004)., Determination of Trichuris skrjabini by sequenting of the ITS1-5.8S-ITS2 segment of the ribosomal DNA. Comparative molecular study of different species of Trichurids., J. Parasitol., 90(3), 648-652.
  5. Folmer O., Black M., Hoeh W., Lutz R. and Vrijenhoek R. (1994)., DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome C oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates., Mol. Marine Biol. Biotech., 3(5), 294-299.
  6. Floyd R.M., Rogers A.D., Lambshead P.J.D. and Smith C.R. (2005)., Nematode-specific PCR primers for the 18S small subunit rRNA gene., Mol. Ecol. Notes, 5(3), 611-612.
  7. Cutillas C., Rozas M.de, Ariza C., Ubeda J.M. and Guevar D.C. (2009)., Molecular identification of Trichuris vulpis and Trichuris suis isolated from different hosts., Parasitol. Res., 100(2), 383-389.
  8. Altschul S.F., Gish W., Miller W., Myres E.W. and Lipman D.J. (1990)., Basic local alignment search tool., J. Mol. Biol., 215(3), 403-410.
  9. Saitou N. and Nei M. (1987)., The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees., Mol. Biol. Evolut., 4(4), 406-425.
  10. Tamura K., Dudley J., Nei M. and Kumar S. (2007)., MEGA 4: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0., Mol. Biol. Evolut., 24(8), 1596-1599.
  11. Thompson J.D., Gibson T.J., Plewniak F., Jeanmougin F. and Higgens D.G. (1997)., The Clustam X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided quality analysis tools., Nucl. Acids Res., 25, 4876-4882.
  12. Kimura M. (1980)., A simple method for estimating evolutionary rate of base substitutions through comparative studies on nucleotide sequences., J. Mol. Evolut., 16(2), 111-120.
  13. Hall T.A. (1999)., Bioedit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for windows 95/98/NT., Nucl. Acids Symp. Ser., 41, 95-98.
  14. Felsenstein J. (1985)., Confidence limit on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap., Evolut., 39(4), 783-791.
  15. Shamsi S., Normann R., Gasser R. and Beveridge I. (2009)., Redescription and genetic characterization of selected Contracaecum spp. (Nematoda: Anisakidae) from various host in Australia., Parasitol. Res., 104(6), 1507-1525.
  16. Upadhyay S.K. (2017)., Molecular barcode analysis and phylogeny of helminthes parasites: A manual., Souvenir of 7th International Science Congress, Royal University of Bhutan, Chukkha, Butan. 8-9 Dec., p48. ISBN 978-93-84659-79-0.