International E-publication: Publish Projects, Dissertation, Theses, Books, Souvenir, Conference Proceeding with ISBN.  International E-Bulletin: Information/News regarding: Academics and Research

Non-Edible Castor Oil – An Esoteric Potential Foliage of Methyl and Ethyl Ester, a Sustainable additive Package for Agricultural Diesel Engines

Author Affiliations

  • 1School of engineering & Technology, Centurion University, Jatni-752050, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India
  • 2School of engineering & Technology, Centurion University, Jatni-752050, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India
  • 3School of engineering & Technology, Centurion University, Jatni-752050, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India
  • 4Founder of Science Foundation for Rural and Tribal Resource Development, Odisha, India

Res. J. Recent Sci., Volume 5, Issue (11), Pages 8-16, November,2 (2016)

Abstract

Ever augmenting world energy demand rationalise to prolific urbanization, better living standards and increasing population. When society is cognizant of depleting reserves of fossil fuels beside the deteriorating global climate, it is apparent that biodiesel promises to make a handsome contribution to the future energy demands of the domestic and industrial economies. Among different edible (crop based) and non-edible potential foliages of biodiesel (mono alkyl esters) castor is an esoteric potential of sustainable energy and promising substitute for crop-based biodiesel. The present work investigates the possibility of a novel fuel additive package synthesized from castor oil for agricultural diesel engines. The research challenge of fuelling diesel engines with crude castor oil in absolute package concerns its high viscosity. The mechanism of transesterification using lower or higher alcohols subsides the viscosity of crude castor oil to an acceptable range and other properties were evaluated using diesel as baseline fuel. In present investigation, castor oil methyl and ethyl esters (COME and COEE) were synthesized using both methanol and ethanol. The physical and chemical properties of COME and COEE were proximal and COME revealed a little higher viscosity than that of COEE. Low temperature operability (cloud point and pour point) of COEE were better than those of COME. Engine performance and exhaust emission characteristics were analysed using additive package to diesel such as COME20, COEE20 and absolute package of COME, COEE, with petroleum diesel being the standard fuel. Results inferred that COME yielded a little higher power than that of COEE and hazardous emissions of COEE being slightly lower than that of COME. The research work concludes that both COME and COEE can be used as an additive package (20%) to petroleum diesel in agricultural CI engines without any modification in engine hardware. However absolute package of COME and COEE to agricultural CI engines extends the research work to an aesthetical change in engine hardware facilitating preheat up to 60-1000C overcoming cold weather operability.

References

  1. Demirbas A. (2009)., Progress and recent trends in biodiesel fuels., Energy Conversion and Management, 50(1), 14-34.
  2. No S.Y. (2011)., Inedible vegetable oils and their derivatives for alternative diesel fuels in CI engines: a review., Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15(1), 131-149.
  3. Agarwal A.K. and Rajamanoharan K. (2007)., Biofuels (alcohols and biodiesel) applications as fuels for internal combustion engines., Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 33(3), 233-271.
  4. Singh S.P. and Singh D. (2010)., Biodiesel production through the use of different sources and characterization of oils and their esters as the substitute of diesel: a review., Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 14(1), 200-216.
  5. Lapuerta M. and Armas O. and Rodriguez F.J. (2008)., Effect of biodiesel fuels on diesel engine emissions., Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 34(2), 198-223.
  6. Ahmad A.L., Yasin N.H.M., Derek C.J.C. and Lim J.K. (2011)., Microalgae as a sustainable energy source for biodiesel production: a review., Renewable and Sustain-able Energy Reviews, 15(1), 584-593.
  7. Ramadhas A.S., Muraleedharan C. and Jayaraj S. (2005)., Performance and emission evaluation of a diesel engine fueled with methyl esters of rubber seed oil., Renew Energy, 20, 1-12.
  8. Wagner L.E., Clark S.J. and Scrock M.D. (1984)., Effects of soybean oil esters on the performance, lubricating oil and wear of diesel engines., SAE: paper no.841385.
  9. Gui M.M., Lee K.T. and Bhatia S. (2008)., Feasibility of edible oil vs. non-edible oil vs. Waste edible oil as biodiesel feedstock., Energy, 33(11), 1646-1653.
  10. Sanford S.D., White J.M., Shah P.S., Wee C., Valverde M.A. and Meier G.R. (2009)., Feedstock and biodiesel characteristics report., Renewable Energy Group, Ames, Availablefrom:/http://www.regfuel.com/pdfs/Feedstock%20 and%20Biodiesel%20 Characteristics%20Report.pdfS.
  11. Pinzi S., Garcia I.L., Gimenez F.J.L., Castro M.D.L., Dorado G. and Dorado M.P. (2009)., The ideal vegetable oil-based biodiesel composition: a review of social, economical and technical implications., Energy & Fuels, 23, 2325-2341.
  12. Kumar A. and Sharma S. (2011)., Potential non-edible oil resources as biodiesel feed-stock: an Indian perspective., Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15(4), 1791-1800.
  13. Gui M.M., Lee K.T. and Bhatia S. (2008)., Feasibility of edible oil vs. non-edible oil vs. Waste edible oil as biodiesel feedstock., Energy, 33(11), 1646-1653.
  14. Ogunniyi D.S. (2006)., Castor oil: a vital industrial raw material., Bio resource Technology, 97(9), 1086-1091.
  15. Berman P., Nizri S. and Wiesman Z. (2011)., Castor oil biodiesel and its blends as alternative fuel., Biomass and Bioenergy, 35, 2861-2866.
  16. Santana G.C.S., Martins P.F., de Lima da Silva N., Batistella C.B., Maciel Filho R. and Wolf Maciel M.R. (2010)., Simulation and cost estimate for biodiesel production using castor oil., Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 88, 626-632.
  17. Canakci M. and Van Gerpen J. (2003)., A pilot plant to produce biodiesel from high free fatty acid feedstocks., Am Soc Agri Eng, 46(4), 945-954.
  18. Ramadhas A.S., Jayaraj S. and Muraleedharan C. (2005)., Biodiesel production from high FFA rubber seed oil., Fuel, 84(4), 335-340.
  19. Meher L.C., Vidya S., Dharmagadda S. and Naik S.N. (2006)., Optimization of alkali-catalyzed transesterification of Pongamia pinnata oil for production of biodiesel., Bio-resource Technol, 97(12), 1392-1397.
  20. Veljkovic V.B., Lakicevic S.H., Stamenkovic O.S., Todorovic Z.B. and Lazic M.L. (2006)., Biodiesel production from tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.) seed oil with a high content of free fatty acids., Fuel, 85, 2671-2675.
  21. Agarwal A.K. and Das. L.M. (2006)., Biodiesel development and characterization for use as a fuel in compression ignition engines., J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 123(2), 440-447.
  22. Sahoo P.K., Das L.M., Babu M.K.G. and Naik S.N. (2006)., Biodiesel development from high acid value polanga seed oil and performance evaluation in a CI engine., Fuel, 86(3), 448-454.
  23. Kumar C., Babu M.K.G. and Das L.M. (2006)., Experimental investigations on a Karanja oil methyl ester fueled DI diesel engine., SAE, 2006-01-0238.
  24. Baiju B., Das L.M. and Babu M.K.G. (2007)., Utilization of rubber seed oil based biodiesel in a compression ignition engine., Rahul M, editor. Proceedings of the Indo-Korean Symposium. Convenor, BIOHORIZON 07, BETA. Delhi, India: Department of Biochemical Engg & Biotechnology, Indian Institute of Technology, 2.03-1-18.
  25. Ali Y., Hanna M.A. and Cuppett S.L. (1995)., Fuel properties of tallow and soybean oil esters., J. Am. Oil. Chem. Soc., 72(12), 1557-1564.