10th International Science Congress (ISC-2020) will be Postponed to 8th and 9th December 2021 Due to COVID-19.  International E-publication: Publish Projects, Dissertation, Theses, Books, Souvenir, Conference Proceeding with ISBN.  International E-Bulletin: Information/News regarding: Academics and Research

The assessment of Morality and Human Right in Religious Political Jurisprudence

Author Affiliations

  • 1Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, IRAN

Res. J. Recent Sci., Volume 5, Issue (1), Pages 51-55, January,2 (2016)

Abstract

Morality and taking attention into morality system in any society were from the issues which attracted philosophers and researchers from many years ago. Religious Political Jurisprudence and human‘s right are from the points which involve effectiveness and necessity in Iran and worldwide, by which it could be said that these matters could not be devoid of morality. According to the permanency of the precepts of God on one hand, and the pragmatism through the religious Political Jurisprudence with giving meaning to the precepts of God on the other hand, it has been attempted to make the Islamic government as a stable system. Along this, presenting implication for morality and the speech definitions related to human right such as freedom, equality, justice, and etc are different from the instructions which are in the west morality systems. For this, in present paper with regard to the viewpoints of Imam Khomeini who is the Guardianship of the Islamic Jurists and Establisher of an Islamic Government in Iran and Ayatollah Mesbah-Yazdi‘s viewpoints who is the most important theorist in Iran, it has been attempted to discuss the Religious Political Jurisprudence regarding the routine pragmatisms in contrast to the west morality system and the definitions of human right. Also in present paper, based on the morality system, definitions of human right and within the Islamic jurisprudence, we are attempted to know “whether the Religious Political Jurisprudence is relevant with the morality system of Kant or not?”, and to know” whether it is relevant with utilitarianism theory or not?” Here this point is also important to know “whether is the Religious Political Jurisprudence against the other morality systems or not? “Also, based on the speech definitions of human right in the morality system, what would be concluded finally?

References

  1. Islami Hasan (2001), Imam, morality, politic, theInstitute for the Codification and Publication of theWorks of Imam Khomeini.
  2. Immanuel Kant (1990), On the Metaphysics of Moralsand Ethics, translated by Hamid Enayat and Ali Qeisari ,Kharazmi publication., Tehran,
  3. Imam Khomeini (2006), Anthropology in ImamKhomeinis viewpoint, the Institute for the Codificationand Publication of the Works of Imam Khomeini, firstedition, Tehran.
  4. Imam Khomeini (2000), Freedom in viewpoint of ImamKhomeini, the Institute for the Codification andPublication of the Works of Imam Khomeini, firstedition, Tehran.
  5. Imam Khomeini (1994), Tahrirolvasyleh, translated byMohammad Baqer Mosavi Hamedani, Darolmoalempublication, fifth edition, Qom.
  6. Imam Khomeini (1998), Imam Khomeini, the Institute for the Codification andPublication of the Works of Imam Khomeini.
  7. Imam Khomeini (2015)., Sahife-iNur, Co-operativePublishing Company for Islamic works.
  8. Imam Khomeini (1978), Guardianship, Amir Kabirpublication, new edition, Tehran.
  9. Aouni Brouse (2001), Morality theory of Kant,translated by Alireza Al Booyeh, Boostan publication,Qom.
  10. Bayat Abdolrasol et al (2000), Dictionary for words,religious culture and thought institution, first edition,Qom.
  11. Jahanbeglo Ramin (1993), Modernity, democracy andelites, center publication, first edition, Tehran.
  12. Qorban Nia Naser (1995)., Morality and presentation ofcriticisms for morality, 1 -2, (1994-1995).
  13. Mahmoodi Seid Ali (1997), Consistency of morality andpolitic, culture bibliography, 3-4.
  14. Mesbah Yazdi and Mohammad Taqi (1999), Islam sjuridical theory, research and educational institute ofImam Khomeini, first edition.
  15. Mesbah Yazdi and Mohammad Taqi (2000), Religionand freedom, center of cultural studies in Qom, firstedition.
  16. Mesbah Yazdi and Mohammad Taqi (1998), Justice andpolitic in Quran, research and educational institute ofImam Khomeini s works, Qom
  17. Mesbah Yazdi and Mohammad Taqi (1999), Politicaltheory in Islam, research and educational institute ofImam Khomeinis works, Qom.
  18. Mesbah Yazdi and Mohammad Taqi (2007), Moralityphilosophy, international publication company, thirdedition.
  19. Mesbah Yazdi and Mohammad Taqi (2010), professorsresponse to students.
  20. Mir, Mosavi, Seid, Ali Haqiqat and Seid Sadeq (2001).Basis of humans right in viewpoint of Islam,contemporary knowledge and notion institute.
  21. Jopsephine Joseph Dr, Gopalakrishnan TR and Srivalli, P(2003), Training communications for the digital era, Challenges and opportunities, Journal of Communication,Karnataka University, December, 63.
  22. Sarma KS (2005). Public service broadcasting, YojanaNovember issue, 45.
  23. Sarma KS (2005), Modernizing and moving ahead(interview), Frontline, October 7, 98.
  24. Sambadan V.S. (2006), For that old magic, Frontline,January 27, 87.
  25. Singh Govind (2005)., Community FM in India, SPAN,Jan/ Feb, 46.
  26. Davis Robert J. (2007), The Alignment of ManagementDevelopment with Organizations Goals and Objectives,Branson Management technologies, Available at: Googlesight
  27. Mostafa K., Batool R., Parvaneh P. and Alireza A.(2013), Identify and Ranking Factors Affecting BankMaskan Service Quality using Kano Model, ResearchJournal of Recent Sciences, 2(4), 11-19.
  28. Labovitz, George H (2006), The Power of Alignment:How the Right Tods Enhance Organizational Focus, Available at: www.bpmmag.net/magazine/article.html.
  29. Bozorgi F. (2004), Social, organizational and personalgoals, Tadbir journal, 15, 144.
  30. Alvani S.M. (2007), Public management, Tehran, Neypublication