9th International Science Congress (ISC-2019).  International E-publication: Publish Projects, Dissertation, Theses, Books, Souvenir, Conference Proceeding with ISBN.  International E-Bulletin: Information/News regarding: Academics and Research

Supplier's? Selection in Supply Chain with Combined QFD and ANP Approaches (Case study)

Author Affiliations

  • 1Department of Management, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, IRAN

Res. J. Recent Sci., Volume 2, Issue (6), Pages 66-77, June,2 (2013)

Abstract

Supplier decisions are one of the most important aspects that firms must incorporate into their strategic processes. Buyer-supplier relationships play a key role in the success and effectiveness of a supply chain. The aim of this study was to develop an integrated analytical approach, combining quality function deployment (QFD) and analytic network process (ANP) approach, to evaluate the performance of suppliers. The effectiveness of the proposed approach is demonstrated by applying it to water industrial (East Azerbaijan Regional Water Company), questionnaires had been distributed to gather data for this study among experts in East Azerbaijan Regional Water Company. The findings indicated that supplier P.A.S with a 0.3010 weight score, is the first choice for the supply of strategic Items, supplier "Generator Dynamic" with a 0.2456 weight score, is the first choice for the supply of leverage Items supplier "Color Pars" with a 0.3338 weight score, is the first choice for the supply of average Items, Criterion "Quality" with a 0.2113 weight score, is the most important criterion in the selection of a supplier’s offer. Sub-Criterion "Innovation and technical skills" with a 0.15096 weight score, is the most important Sub-criterion in the selection of a supplier’s offer.Finally suggestions presented.

References

  1. Bechtel C., Jayaram J., Supply chain management: A strategic perspective, International Journal of Logistics Management, 8(1), 15-34 (1997)
  2. Chan L.K. and Wu M.L., Quality function deployment: a literature review, European Journal of Operational Research, 143(5), 463-497 (2002)
  3. Chen I.J. and Paulraj A., Understanding supply chain management: critical research and a theoretical framework, International Journal of Production Research, 42(1), 131-63 (2004)
  4. Demirtas E. and Ustun O., An integrated multi objective decision making process for supplier selection and order allocation, OMEGA, 36(1), 76-90 (2008)
  5. Ghodsypour S.H. and O’Brien C., The total cost of Logistics in supplier selection, unde conditions of multiple souring, multiple criteria and capacity constraint, International Journal of Production Economics, 73(3), 199-222 (2001)
  6. Gonzalez M. and Eckelman C., The application of system dynamics to the kitchen cabinet industry through the use of dynamic simulation software, Proceedings of CIFAC ’94, Atlanta, GA (1994)
  7. Hsiao S.W., Concurrent design method for developing a new product, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics., 29(6), 41–55 (2002)
  8. Jharkharia S. and Shankar, R., Selection of logistics service provider: an analytic network process (ANP) approach, OMEGA, 35, 274-89 (2007)
  9. Karsak E.E., Sozer S. and Alptekin S.E., Product planning in quality function deployment using a combined analytic network process and goal programming approach, Computers & Industrial Engineering, 44(1), 171-190 (2003)
  10. Kwong C.K. and Bai H., Determining the importance weights for the customer requirements in QFD using a fuzzy AHP with an extent analysis approach, IIE Transactions, 35(7), 619-626 (2003)
  11. Leenders M., Johnson P.F., Flynn A. and Fearon H.E., Purchasing Supply Management, 13th ed., McGraw- Hill, New York, NY (2006)
  12. Li L. and Zabinsky Z.B., Incorporating uncertainty in to a supplier selection problem, I.J. of production Economics Article in Press (2010)
  13. Mizuno S. and Akao Y., QFD: The Customer- Driven Approach to Quality Planning and Deployment, Asian Productivity Organization (1994)
  14. Partovi F.Y., A quality function deployment approach to strategic capital budgeting, Engineering Economist, 44(3), 239-60 (1999)
  15. Partovi F.Y., An analytic model to quantify strategic service vision, International Journal of Service Industry Management, 12(5), 476-500 (2001)
  16. Partovi F.Y. and Corredoira R.A., Quality function deployment for the good of soccer, European Journal of Operational Research, 137(3), 642-656 (2002)
  17. Phusavat K., Kanchana R. and Helo P., Supplier management: past, present and anticipated future per¬spectives, International Journal of Management and Enterprise Development, 4(5), 502-19 (2007)
  18. Saaty T.L., Fundamentals of the Analytic Network Process, Japan, Kobe: ISAHP (1999)
  19. Saaty R.W., The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) for Decision Making and the Analytic Network Process (ANP) for Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback, Creative Decisions Foundation (2003)
  20. Shee D.Y., Tzeng G.H., Tang T.I., AHP, Fuzzy Measure and Fuzzy Integral Approaches for the Appraisal of Information Service Providers in Taiwan, Journal of Global Information Technology Management, 6(1), 8-30 (2003)
  21. Sohn S.Y., Choi I.S., Fuzzy QFD for supply chain management with reliability consideration, Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 72(3), 327-334 (2001)
  22. Telgen J., Inzicht en overzicht: de uitdagingen van Besliskunde en Inkoopmanagement. Academical ad¬dress at the University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands (1994)
  23. Talluri S., Narasimhan R. and Nair A., Vendor performance with supply risk: a chance-constrained DEA approach, International Journal of Production Economics, 100(2), 212-22 (2006)
  24. Wacker J.G., A theoretical model of manufacturing lead times and their relationship to a manufacturing goal hierarchy, Decision Sciences, 27(3), 483-517 (1996)
  25. Wadhwa S., Saxena A. and Chan F.T.S., Framework for flexibility in dynamic supply chain management, International Journal of Production Research, 46(6), 1373-404 (2006)
  26. Zhang Zho., Lei J., Cao N., To K. and Ng. K., Evolution of supplier selection criteria and methodswww.google.com, des20 (2001)
  27. Park T. and Kim K, Determination of an optimal set of design requirements using house of quality, Journal of Operations Management, 16(6), 569–581 (1998)
  28. Lu M., Madu C.N., Kuei C. and Winokur D., Integrating QFD, AHP, and benchmarking in strategic marketing, Journal of Business and Indus-trial Marketing, 9(1), 41–50 (1994)
  29. Monczka R.M., Trent R. and Handfield R., Purchasing and Supply Chain Management, 2nd ed., South- Western/ Thomson Learning, Cincinnati, OH. Weber, C.A., Current, J.R. and Benton, W.C. (1991), Vendor selection criteria and methods, European Journal of Operational Research, 50 (1), 2-18 (2002)
  30. Lam K. and Zhao X., An application of quality function deployment to improve the quality of teaching, International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 15(4), 389-413 (1998)