6th International Young Scientist Congress (IYSC-2020) will be Postponed to 8th and 9th May 2021 Due to COVID-19. 10th International Science Congress (ISC-2020).  International E-publication: Publish Projects, Dissertation, Theses, Books, Souvenir, Conference Proceeding with ISBN.  International E-Bulletin: Information/News regarding: Academics and Research

Overview of Journal Bibliographic Databases

Author Affiliations

  • 1 Department of Pharmacology, Khaja Banda Nawaz institute of medical sciences, Gulbarga-585104, INDIA

Res. J. Recent Sci., Volume 2, Issue (12), Pages 92-97, December,2 (2013)

Abstract

A bibliographic database is a database of bibliographic records with organized collection of references to published literature. There are several types of medical and general bibliographic databases. Indexation of a journal in a specific database considered a reflection of its quality. Indexed journals receive more submissions when compared to non-indexed journals and many authors prefer to submit their work to indexed journals than non-indexed journals. The oldest index is the Index Medicus published since 1879 is considered to be the most comprehensive index of medical journals. Over the years, due to internet revolution, many other popular indexation services have developed such as, PubMed, MedLine, SCOPUS, EMBASE, EBSCO Publishing’s Electronic Databases etc.. There are various regional and national versions of Index Medicus such as Index Medicus for South East Asia region, Index Medicus for the Eastern Mediterranean Region, African Index Medicus, etc. Knowing the basics of these databases will help research scholars and authors to enhance their writing skills and help in publication their research work.

References

  1. Sahu D.K., Small journal vs. high impact journal: Dilemma of a new author, Indian J Pharmacol,41(3), 95-96, (2009)
  2. Feather John and Sturges Paul, eds. International Encyclopedia of Information and Library Science, 2nd edition, London: Routledge, 127 (2003)
  3. Holzer L. and Eyers J., Medical Bibliographic Database, StudentBMJ,16, 366-7 (2008)
  4. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/ NBK3827/#pubmedhelp (2012)
  5. Available from http://www.nlm.nih.gov/pubs/factsheets/ jsel.html (2013)
  6. Kejariwal D. and Mahawar K.K., Is Your Journal Indexed in PubMed? Relevance of PubMed in Biomedical Scientific Literature Today, WebmedCentral MISCELLANEOUS,3(3), WMC003159 (2012)
  7. Mahawar K.K., Role of Peer Review in Biomedical Publishing, WebmedCentral MISCELLANEOUS,2(4), WMC001863 (2011)
  8. Conn V.S., Valentine J.C., Cooper H.M. and Rantz M.J., Gray literature in meta-analyses, Nurs Res,52(4), 256-61 (2003)
  9. Available from http://www.webmedcentral.com (2013)
  10. Smith R., Classical peer review: an empty gun, Breast Cancer Res12(Suppl 4), S13, (2010)
  11. Available from http://f1000research.com/, (2013)
  12. Available from http://www.nlm.nih.gov/pubs/factsheets/ medline.html. (2013)
  13. Available from http://www.elsevier.com/online-tools/embase/about?q=what-embase (2013)
  14. Available from http://www.elsevier.com/online-tools/embase/about (2013)
  15. Ng K.H., Peh W.C.G., Getting to know journal bibliographic databases, Singapore Med J,51(10), 757-761 (2010)
  16. Available from http://www.thecochranelibrary.com/view/ 0/AboutTheCochraneLibrary.html. (2013)
  17. Available from http://clinicalevidence.bmj.com/x /index.html. (2013)
  18. Available from http://www.cabdirect.org/web/about.html. (2013)
  19. Available from http://www.google.com/intl/en/scholar/ about.html. (2013)
  20. Beel J. and Gipp B., Google Scholar’s Ranking Algorithm: An Introductory Overview. In Birger Larsen and Jacqueline Leta, editors, Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics (ISSI’09), volume 1, pages 230–241, Rio de Janeiro (Brazil), July 2009. International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics (2009)
  21. Available from http://www.info.sciverse.com/scopus/. (2013)
  22. Falagas M.E., Pitsouni E.I., Malietzis G.A., Pappas G., Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses, FASEB J.,22(2), 338-42 (2008)
  23. Available from http://thomsonreuters.com/content/science/ scripts/elqnow/elqRedir.htm?ref=http://thomsonreuters.com/content/science/pdf/Web_of_Knowledge_factsheet.pdf (2013)
  24. Available from http://thomsonreuters.com/content/science/ scripts/elqnow/elqRedir.htm?ref=http://thomsonreuters.com/content/science/pdf/Web_of_Science_factsheet.pdf. (2013)
  25. Available from http://is4oa.org/doaj/. (2013)
  26. Available from http://www.doaj.org/doaj?func=load Template&template=about&uiLanguage=en. (2013)
  27. Available from http://journals.indexcopernicus.com/. (2013)
  28. Available from http://www.emro.who.int/information-resources/health-knowledge-initiatives-ghl/global-health-library.html. (2013)
  29. Available from http://www.emro.who.int/information-resources/hinari/hinari.html/. (2013)
  30. Hendersen J. Google Scholar: A source for clinicians? CMAJ172(12), 1549–50, (2005)