Sports by Choice or by Socio-Economic Status
- 1Ch Devi Lal University, Sirsa, Haryana, India
- 2MD University, Rohtak, Haryana, India
Res. J. of Physical Education Sci., Volume 4, Issue (3), Pages 1-11, March,23 (2016)
Socio-economic status (SES) a model construct widely studied by researchers of all hues for categorization of families in various divisions. Though SES has been numerously correlated with other variables but correlating it with sportspersons is a unique endeavor, where the present study has been undertaken to verify the proposition that SES significantly influences the decision of the young prospective entrantsí vis-ŗ-vis type of sports they choose. A total 231 sportspersons [189 males and 49 females] belonging to 14 different sports disciplines were selected from the stadium and other sports academies spread across the Bhiwani district of state of Haryana. A performa (containing 13 items) especially so designed, based on the previous available intellectual material, was used to collect the data. The onsite data collection was bonus for the investigators in terms of live interaction with bodily strength of young India. The data analysis revealed interesting insight favouring the proposition. However, it is pertinent to mention here that the result of the study is required to be tested across the country with larger samples drawn from the population of interest prior to generalization and ascertaining itsí validity and reliability. Constructive suggestions and criticism will be highly appreciated and in fact solicited.
- Mehr Ali Hemmati Nezhad, Mohammad Mahdi Rahmati and Mohsen Manochehri Nezhad (2012)., Relationship between social-economic status of family and adolescents student sport participation., Annals of Biological Research. 3(8), 4012-4016. ISSN 0976-1233.
- Oakes J.M. and Rossi. P.H. (2003)., The measurement of SES in health research: current practice and steps toward a new approach., Soc Sci Med, 56(4), 769-84.
- Abuqamar M, Coomans D and Louckx F (2011)., International Journal of Sociology and Anthropology., 3(1), 15-21.
- DSS (2016). D, ifferences in Socioeconomic Status., http://www. studymode.com/essays/Differences-In-Socioeconomic-Status-891497.html. 17 August 2013.
- Arrow K.J., Bowles S. and Durlauf. S.N. (2000)., Meritocracy and economic inequality, (An unpublished essay).
- Gesquiere L.R., Learn N.H., Simao M., Onyango P.O., Alberts S.C. and Altmann J. (2011)., Life at the Top: Rank and Stress in Wild Male Baboons., Science, 333(6040), 357.
- Sapolsky R.M. (2005)., The influence of social hierarchy on primate health., Science, 308 (5722), 648.
- Shankar Reddy Dudala and Arlappa N. (2013)., An Updated Prasadís Socio Economic Status Classification for 2013., International Journal of Research and Development Health. 1(2), ISSN: 2321 Ė 1431.
- IHDS (2016)., Indian Human Development Survey., http://ihds. umd.edu/questionnaires. 17 August 2013.
- S. Mahendra Dev. (2012)., Small Farmers in India: Challenges and Opportunities. Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research, Mumbai., (http://www. igidr.ac.in/pdf/ publication /WP-2012-014.pdf).
- Statistical Abstract Haryana (2010)., Government of Haryana Publication No. 997., Department of Economic and Statistical Analysis, Haryana.
- Measuring Socioeconomic Status (2016)., E-Source, Behavioural and Social Sciences Research., http://www. esourceresearch.org/eSourceBook/MeasuringSocioeconomicStatus/2Introduction/tabid/866/Default.aspx. 03 March 2016.