6th International Young Scientist Congress (IYSC-2020) will be Postponed to 8th and 9th May 2021 Due to COVID-19. 10th International Science Congress (ISC-2020).  International E-publication: Publish Projects, Dissertation, Theses, Books, Souvenir, Conference Proceeding with ISBN.  International E-Bulletin: Information/News regarding: Academics and Research

Naming differences among lexical categories in Hubli-Dharwad (India) Kannada dialect

Author Affiliations

  • 1JSS Institute of Speech and Hearing, Dharwad, Karnataka, India
  • 2JSS Institute of Speech and Hearing, Dharwad, Karnataka, India
  • 3JSS Institute of Speech and Hearing, Dharwad, Karnataka, India
  • 4JSS Institute of Speech and Hearing, Dharwad, Karnataka, India

Res. J. Language and Literature Sci., Volume 7, Issue (1), Pages 1-8, January,19 (2020)

Abstract

Remarkable changes have been noticed in vocabulary of different dialects of Kannada language which is an official language of Karnataka. As differences in dialects are seen in Phonology, morphology and semantics, measuring this becomes essential. Aim of the current research was to inspect and explore the lexical, semantic and phonological differences in naming of different lexical categories in children of northern Karnataka with that of Mysuru. A total of 100 children (50 Mysuru Kannada dialects and 50 North Karnataka region) in the age range of 4-6 years were considered for the study. All children were native speakers of respective dialect, studying in Government schools with no or minimal exposure to other languages and dialects. Study was carried out in 3 phases. Preparing picturized word list, checking reliability of pictures and naming task of selected pictures were the three phases respectively. Further MANOVA was done as there were many dependent variables. Results revealed that there was a noteworthy difference between group one and group two for all the lexical domains. Frequency distribution examined the frequency of occurrence of type of substitution errors among two groups. The results of the study will help in establishing rehabilitation protocols for the individuals residing in northern part of Karnataka and also provides proper guidelines for speech language therapist in choosing appropriate words for semantic teaching.

References

  1. Rajapurohit B.B. (1982)., Acoustic characteristics of Kannada., Central Institute of Indian Languages, 27.
  2. Sridhar S. (1981)., Linguistic convergence: Indo-Aryanization of Dravidian languages., Lingua, 53(2-3), 199-220.
  3. Hinskens F., Auer P. and Kerswill P. (2005)., The study of dialect convergence and divergence: conceptual and methodological considerations., Dialect change: Convergence and divergence in European languages, 1-48.
  4. Upadhyaya U.P. (1976)., A comparative study of Kannada dialects: Bellary, Gulbarga, Kumta, and Nanjangud dialects., Prasārānga, University of Mysore.
  5. Shareah M.A.Q.A., Abdulhakim B., Mudhsh D.M. and Al-Takhayinh A.H. (2015)., An overview on dialectal variation., International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 5(6), 1-5.
  6. Bowerman M. (1978)., The acquisition of word meaning. An investi¬gation into some current conflicts., In Waterron N and Snow C (Eds): The development of communication, New York: John Wiley and Sons, 263-287.
  7. Crosswhite K., Alderete J., Beasley T. and Markman V. (2003)., Morphological effects on default stress in novel Russian words., In WCCFL 22 Proceedings, 151-164.
  8. Emmorey K.D. (1989)., Auditory morphological priming in the lexicon., Language and Cognitive Processes, 4(2), 73-92. doi:10.1080/01690968908406358
  9. McCormick L. and Schiefelburch R. (1984)., An Introduction to language intervention. In early language Intervention., A Bell and Howell company: Columbus.
  10. Florian Jaeger T. and Elisabeth J. Norcliffe (2009)., The Cross‐linguistic Study of Sentence Production., Language and Linguistics Compass, 3(4), 866-887.
  11. Wilhelm Glaser R. (1992)., Picture naming., Cognition, 42(1-3), 61-105.
  12. Barry C., Morrison C.M. and Ellis A.W. (1997)., Naming the snodgrass and vanderwart pictures: effects of age of acquisition, frequency, and name agreement., The quarterly journal of experimental psychology, 50(3), 560-585.
  13. Roy Lachman, Juliet Popper Shaffer and Deborah Hennrikus (1974)., Language and cognition: effect of stimulus codability, name-word frequency, and age of acquisition on lexical reaction time., Journal of memory and language, 13(6), 613-625.
  14. Johnson C.J., Paivio A. and Clark J.M. (1996)., Cognitive components of picture naming., Psychological Bulletin, 120(1), 113.
  15. Suarez J.I., Mlakar D. and Snodgrass S.M. (1996)., Cerebral syphilitic gumma in an HIV-negative patient presenting as prolonged focal motor status epilepticus., New England Journal of Medicine, 335(15), 1159-1160.
  16. Vitkovitch M. and Tyrrell L. (1995)., Sources of disagreement in object naming., The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 48(4), 822-848.
  17. Rickford J.R. and Rickford A.E. (1995)., Dialect readers revisited., Linguistics and Education, 7(2), 107-128. doi:10.1016/0898-5898(95)90003-9
  18. Connie (2004)., Slang. In Edward Finegan and John R. Rickford (eds.)., Language in the USA. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 375-386.