Evaluation report of 11th professional training under watershed project at Fatehjang, Punjab-Pakistan
- 1Social Sciences Research Institute, National Agricultural Research Centre, Islamabad
- 2Social Sciences Research Institute, National Agricultural Research Centre, Islamabad
- 3Social Sciences Research Institute, National Agricultural Research Centre, Islamabad
- 4Social Sciences Research Institute, National Agricultural Research Centre, Islamabad
Int. Res. J. Social Sci., Volume 9, Issue (4), Pages 1-10, October,14 (2020)
This paper aimed to assess the effectiveness of training on professionals knowledge and skills and to provide suggestions that how can further improve the knowledge levels of respondents through effective training program in future. An 11th professional training on Watershed Rehabilitation & Irrigation Technology Improvement was organized by CAEWRI, NARC dated 12th to 14th May, 2015. The training was held at Fatehjang Field Station of NARC at district Punjab with the financial support of ICARDA and USDA. The main technologies discussed in training were drip irrigation, sprinkler irrigation, solar pumping irrigation and irrigation water scheduling. There were about thirty seven professionals become involved from different government and non-government organizations. Based on the pre and post-training findings, the participants interest and fondness in the training was exceptionally great. Further, the most positive thing of the training was the young professionals participation as 51 percent were belong to age group of (20-30) years. The mean observations of majority training respondents for instructors were positive as 28 percent were strongly agreed and 40 percent were simply agreed about the instructors teaching methods and presenting skills, their subject knowledge, answering to questions ability and keeping the respondent attention during training. Similarly the mean observations of training respondents for overall training were also good as 29 percent of respondents were strongly agreed and 47 percent were simply agreed regarding training relevancy, training facilities, subject information, supporting material, sufficient time for training and the overall quality of training workshop. It is evident from the results that majority of training respondents were rated the training course very positively. However, some respondents had showed neutral response and few were disagreed which indicates the possibility for improvement. Consequently, the post-training results had showed positive impact and an enormous change reported in respondents knowledge and awareness about the technologies. All training participants had showed much attention in training activities and assured that such training programs could generate positive awareness about the new inventions and will be much helpful in technologies dissemination in future. However, this short-term evaluation results indicate to us that this training course were of good quality and had relevant contents.
- Chukwuemeka E. (2012)., Training and Development, A Vital Tool For Organizational Effectiveness., A Case Study of Sterling Bank Nigeria Plc, 6(2), 48-57.
- Bekchanov M. (2014)., Efficient water allocation and water conservation policy modeling in the Aral Sea Basin., Doctoral dissertation, Universitäts -und Landesbibliothek Bonn.
- Apospori E, Nikandrou I, Brewster C. and Papalexandris N. (2008)., HRM and organizational performance in northern and southern Europe., The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 19(7), 1187-207.
- Fanibuyan A. (2001)., Contemporary issues in human resources management and organizational behaviour.,
- Cunha RC, Pina e Cunha M, Morgado A and Brewster C. (2002)., Market forces, strategic management, HRM practices and organizational performance., A model based in a European sample.
- Wheeler T and Kay M. (2010)., Food crop production, water and climate change in the developing world., Outlook on Agriculture, 39(4), 239-43.
- Dubois, Olivier (2011)., The state of the world, Earthscan.
- Molden, David, ed (2013)., Water for food water for life: A comprehensive assessment of water management in agriculture., Routledge.
- Doss CR. (2006)., Analyzing technology adoption using micro studies: limitations, challenges, and opportunities for improvement., Agricultural economics, 34(3), 207-19.
- Strzepek K and Boehlert B. (2010). Competition for water for the food system. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, B: Biological Sciences, 365(1554), 2927-40., undefined, undefined
- Vörösmarty CJ, Green P, Salisbury J and Lammers RB. (2000)., Global water resources: vulnerability from climate change and population growth., Science, 289(5477), 284-8.
- Drechsel, Pay, Sophie Graefe, MoiseSonou, and Olufunke O. Cofie (2006)., Informal irrigation in urban West Africa: An overview., IWMI, Vol. 102.
- Green G, Sunding D, Zilberman D and Parker D. (1996)., Explaining irrigation technology choices: a microparameter approach., American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 78(4), 1064-72.
- Laube W. (2008)., Comparing Different Types of Irrigation in the Ghanaian White Volta Basin: Institutional, Socio-Economic and Agricultural Aspects., InA Paper Presented at the Glowa-Volta Project (GVP) Workshop on Irrigation Options in the Changing Environment of the White Volta Basin.
- Ward FA and Pulido-Velazquez M. (2008)., Water conservation in irrigation can increase water use., Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(47), 18215-20.
- Kulkarni S. (2011)., Innovative technologies for water saving in irrigated agriculture., International journal of water resources and arid environments, 1(3), 226-31.
- Foster AD and Rosenzweig MR. (2010)., Microeconomics of technology adoption., Annu. Rev. Econ., 2(1), 395-424.
- Carletto, Calogero, Angeli Kirk, Paul Winters, and Benjamin Davis (2007)., Non-traditional crops, traditional constraints: the adoption and diffusion of export crops among Guatemalan smallholders., The World Bank.