7th International Science Congress (ISC-2017).  International E-publication: Publish Projects, Dissertation, Theses, Books, Souvenir, Conference Proceeding with ISBN.  International E-Bulletin: Information/News regarding: Academics and Research

Difficulty in dismantling the patriarchal structuring of the legal profession

Author Affiliations

  • 1University of Calcutta, West Bengal, India

Int. Res. J. Social Sci., Volume 6, Issue (3), Pages 15-26, March,14 (2017)

Abstract

The research studied 60 women lawyers from urban Kolkata. Most of the respondents interviewed were into solo practice in the High Court at Calcutta. The study finds how the discrepancy is embedded in the very system of the judicial practice. In spite of the laws existing in the country favouring the women, the women lawyers in this very profession are continuously in a struggle to prove themselves. So the amazing part of the profession is that the women lawyers themselves cannot protect themselves in various ways when the laws are to safeguard the rights of all the women across the country. The problems of over-assessment is a typical characteristic noted in the study where the women inspite of her potential is compelled to be under pressure to prove themselves repeatedly as generalized ideas regarding the marital obligations and child birth has been seen as negative attributes of the study. The rigidness amongst the male lawyers to incorporate the women lawyers in their similar networking platform is noteworthy in this context. The patriarchal bound is deeply percolated in the structuring of the legal profession often acting as a major hindrance to the growth of the women lawyers in their profession.

References

  1. The, What Lawyers Need to Know About Gender Bias in the Legal Profession., http://www.lectlaw.com/files/att06.htm. Accessed on 09/12/15
  2. Nedelec A.G. (2007)., Discrimination Against Women Lawyers in England and Wales: An Overview., Gender Forum- An Internet Journal for Gender Studies, 17.
  3. Slotkin J. (2002)., Should I Have Learned to Cook? Interviews with Women Lawyers Juggling Multiple Roles., California Western School of Law-CWSL Scholarly Commons, Paper 135, 13, 153.
  4. Hamade D. (2011)., Female Emirati lawyers still fighting old stereotypes., The National-Opinion. http://www.thenational.ae/thenationalconversation/comment/female-emirati-lawyers-still-fighting-old-stereotypes. Accessed on 02/03/16
  5. Beiner T.M. (2011)., Some Thoughts On The State Of Women Lawyers And Why Title VII Has Not Worked For Them., Indiana Law Review, 44(3), 685. https://mckinneylaw.iu.edu/ilr/pdf/vol44p685.pdf. Accessed on 29/12/2015
  6. Mezrani L. (2014)., Law is failing and hurting women., Lawyers Weekly. http://www.lawyersweekly.com.au/news /15197-Law-is-failing-and-hurting-women. Accessed on 14/12/2015
  7. Bowman C.G. (2009)., Women in the Legal Profession from the 1920s to the 1970s: What Can We Learn From Their Experience About Law and Social Change?., Cornell Law Faculty Publications, Paper 12, 4.
  8. Duff L. and Webley L. (2007)., Women Solicitors as a Barometer for Problems within the Legal Profession Time to Put Values before Profits?., Journal of Law & Society, 34(3), 374-402.
  9. Jachion S. (2015)., Study: Women lawyers likely to take backseat in lead counsel or trial attorney roles., Ms. JD ; Issues: Sexism, Sexual Harassment, and Other Forms of Discrimination; url: http://ms-jd.org/blog/article/study-women-lawyers-likely-to-take-backseat-in-lead-counsel-or-trial-attorn accessed on 03/04/2016
  10. Makhija S. (2016)., Indian women legal lawyers face many challenges., The Sunday Gaurdian. http://www.sunday-guardian.com/analysis/indian-women-legal-lawyers-face-many-challenges. Accessed on 09/08/2016
  11. Ruben M. (2002)., Beating the Odds: Success Strategies for Women in the Legal Profession., Ruben Consulting Group. http://www.leadershiptangles.com/hs-fs/hub/ 80933/file-15725394-pdf/docs/beatingtheodds.pdf. Accessed on 09/08/2016
  12. Kay Fiona M. (2007)., The Social Significance of the World, Osgoode Hall Law Journal, 45(2), 397-424.
  13. Martin S.E. and Jurik N.C. (2007)., Doing justice, doing gender: Women in legal and criminal justice occupations., Social Transformation, School of (SST).
  14. University of Michigan Law School (1989)., Class of 1974 Fifteen Year Report., http://repository.law.umich.edu/cgi/ viewcontent.cgi?article=1048&context=alumni_survey_reports. Accessed on 21/10/2015
  15. Padavic I. and Reskin B.F. (1999)., Sex, Race and Ethnic Inequality in United States Workplaces., Chafetz Saltzman J. Handbook of Sociology of Gender. Chapter16, 343-374, New York : Academic/Plenum Publishers
  16. Hewstone M., Crisp R.J., Contarello A., Voci A., Conway L., Marletta G. and Willis H. (2006)., Tokens in the Tower: Perceptual Processes and Interaction Dynamics in Academic Settings with `Skewed, Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 9 (4), 509-532.
  17. Taddese Y. (2016)., Discrimination in legal profession ‘not going away’., LAW TIMES. http://www.lawtimesnews.com/201310143526/headline-news/discrimination-in-legal-profession-not-going-away. Accessed on 03/04/2016
  18. Brockman J. and Kay M.F. (2000)., Barriers To Gender Equality In The Botswana Legal Establishment., Feminist Legal Studies, 8(2), 169-198.
  19. Kay M.F. and Hagan J. (1994)., Changing Opportunities for Partnership for Men and Women Lawyers During the Transformation of the Modern Law Firm., Osgoode Hall Law Journal, 32(3), 413-456.
  20. Mueller C. and Wallace J. (1996)., Justice and the Paradox of the Contented Female Worker., Social Psychology Quarterly, 59(4), 338-349.
  21. Mossman Mary Jane (2007)., The First Women Lawyers: \"Piecemeal Progress and Circumscribed Success\"., Osgoode Hall Law Journal, 45(2), 379-395.
  22. Mincer J. and Polachek S. (1974)., Family Investments in Human Capital: Earnings of Women., Journal of political Economy, 82(2), 76-108.
  23. Roth L.M. (2004)., Engendering Inequality: Processes of Sex Segregation on Wall Street., Sociological Forum, 19(2), 203-228.
  24. Young M.C. and Wallace J.E. (2009)., Family Responsibilities, Productivity, and Earnings: A Study of Gender Differences Among Canadian Lawyers., Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 30(3), 305-319.
  25. Glaser D. (2000)., Child abuse and neglect and the brain¬-a review., J Child Psychol Psychiatry, 41(1), 97-116.
  26. Schuller T. (2000)., Social and Human Capital: The Search for Appropriate Techno methodology., Policy Studies, 21(1), 25-35.
  27. Coleman J. (1988)., Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital., American Journal of Sociology, 94, 95-120.
  28. Frone Michael R. (2003)., Work-family balance., Handbook of occupational health psychology, (pp. 143-162). Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association, xvii, 475.
  29. Palkovitz R., Dutton K. and Hull J. (2001)., A Resource Theory of Fathering., RESOURCE THEORY, National Council on Family Relations, Baltimore, MD (Nov.), 1-31. https://sites.udel.edu/robp/files/2015/01/Resource-Theory-TCRM-Submission-Copy-unemjy.pdf. Accessed on 22/04/2016
  30. Belkin L. (2013)., Quitting, Because It, The Huffington Post. http://www.huffingtonpost.in/entry/quitting-law-life-work-balance_b_2104259. Accessed on 29/12/2015