9th International Science Congress (ISC-2019).  International E-publication: Publish Projects, Dissertation, Theses, Books, Souvenir, Conference Proceeding with ISBN.  International E-Bulletin: Information/News regarding: Academics and Research

Situational Crime Prevention: An Anthropological Approach

Author Affiliations

  • 1Department of Anthropology, Dr. H.S. Gour University, Sagar, MP, India

Int. Res. J. Social Sci., Volume 5, Issue (9), Pages 7-10, September,14 (2016)

Abstract

“Opportunity makes the theft” it is a very well known saying. Situational Crime prevention word is a mix of three word i.e. situational (state, condition, location, site), crime (offence, wrong, sin, fault), prevention (avoidance, hindrance, obstacle, bar). SCP is a new term for western world and more newer to Indian Context. With the help of the application of this term SCP we will find out the multi-dynamic approach for reducing crime. In Anthropology we all know about Human and in Criminology we know all about crime and with this inter-crux we will find out how SCP is relevant, applicable, important and significant in Indian context. Here an attempt has been made to study Situational Crime Prevention with the lens of Anthropological Approach.

References

  1. Sutherland Edwin H. et. al. (1949)., White Collar Crime., Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New York.
  2. Ronald V. Clarke (1983)., Situational Crime Prevention: Its Theoretical Basis and Practical Scope., Crime and Justice, 4, 225-256, ISBN 0-911577-39-4.
  3. Lewis Edward B. and Tommy T. Sullivan (1979)., Combating crime and citizen attitudes: A case study of the corresponding reality., Journal of Criminal Justice, 7, 71-79.
  4. Gloria Laycock (1985)., Property Marking: a deterrent to domestic burglary?., Crime Prevention Unit: Paper 3 London: Home Office Editor, John Webster Home Office Crime Prevention Unit.
  5. Painter K. (1991)., Evaluation of Public Lighting as a Crime Prevention : the West Park Estate surveys [Ashton under Lyne, 3 tower blocks, surrounded by maisonettes]., Lighting Journal, University of Manchester, Manchester.
  6. Stephen Atkins, Sohail Husain and Angele Storey (1991)., The Influence of Street Lighting on Crime and Fear of Crime., Prevention Unit Paper No. 28, London Home Office Editor: Gloria Laycock Home Office Crime Prevention Unit.
  7. Sherman L.W. and Weisburd D. (1995)., General deterrent effects of police patrol in crime \\\"hot spots\\\": A randomized, controlled trial., Justice Quarterly, 12(4), 625-648.
  8. David Anderson, Sylvia Chenery and Ken Pease (1995)., Biting Back: Tackling Repeat Burglary and Car Crime., Police Research Group - Crime Detection and Prevention Series Paper 58.
  9. Stockdale J and Gresham P.J. (1995)., Combating Burglary: An Evaluation of Three Strategies., Crime Detection and Prevention Series, Paper 59., London.
  10. Ben Brown (1995)., CCTV in Town Centres: Three Case Studies., Police Research Group Crime Detection and Prevention Series: Paper No 68., London: Home Office Police Department Editor: Barry Webb Home Office Police Research Group.
  11. Thomas B. Marvell and Moody C.E. (1996)., Specification Problems, Police Levels, and Crime Rates., Complete URL DOI: 10.1111/j.17459125.1996.tb01221.x.
  12. Sherman Lawrence W. (1997)., Communities and Crime Prevention., Preventing Crime: What Works, What Doesn’t, What’s Promising, Lawrence W. Sherman, Denise C. Gottfredson, Doris L. MacKenzie, John E. Eck, Peter Reuter, and Shawn D. Bushway. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.
  13. Lab Steven P (1997)., Crime Prevention: Approaches, Practices and Evaluation., Third Edition, Anderson Publishing Company, Cincinnati, OH. ISBN 1-58360-509-6.
  14. Jordan Tim and Taylor Paul (1998)., A Sociology of Hackers., Sociological Review, 46(4), 757-780.
  15. Mike Sutton, Jacqueline Schneider and Sarah Hetherington (2001)., Tackling Theft with the Market Reduction Approach., Barry Webb Home Office Policing and Reducing Crime Unit Research, Development and Statistics Directorate Clive House, Petty France London.
  16. Rafael Di Tella and Ernesto Schargrodsky (2004)., Do Police Reduce Crime? Estimates Using the Allocation of Police Forces After a Terrorist Attack., The American Economic Review March, 94(1), 115-133.
  17. Farrington D. and Welsh B. (2002)., Effects of improved street lighting on crime: a systematic review., London, Home Office.
  18. Goodman D.E. (2002)., Midsize cities and their correlates with crime: an empirical investigation., Web Address URL: http://www.ups.edu/econ/working papers/97-1.pdf 13, 4.5, 58
  19. Brandon C. Welsh and David P. Farrington (2002)., Crime prevention effects of closed circuit television: a systematic review., Home Office Research, Development and Statistics Directorate.
  20. David Martin (2002)., Spatial Patterns in Residential Burglary Assessing the Effect of Neighborhood Social Capital., Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 18(2), 132-146, URL: 10.1177/1043986202018002002.
  21. Michael S. Scott (2003)., The Benefits and Consequences of Police Crackdowns., Office of Community Oriented Policing Services, U.S. Department of Justice.
  22. Casey C. and Segessenmann T. et. al. (2003)., Evaluation of the target hardening pilot programme., Ministry of Justice, Wellington.
  23. Nina Cope (2004)., Intelligence Led Policing or Policing Led Intelligence?. Integrating volume crime analysis into policing., British Journal of Criminology, 44(2), 188-203.
  24. Hearnden I. and Magill C. (2004)., Decision making by house burglars: offenders’ perspectives., Home Office Research Findings No.249, Home Office Research, Development and Statistics Directorate, London.
  25. Robin Williams (2004)., The management of crime scene examination in relation to the investigation of burglary and vehicle crime., Home Office Online Report.
  26. Australian Institute of Criminology (2005)., The market reduction approach to reducing property crime., website: http://www.aic.gov.au.