6th International Young Scientist Congress (IYSC-2020) will be Postponed to 8th and 9th May 2021 Due to COVID-19. 10th International Science Congress (ISC-2020).  International E-publication: Publish Projects, Dissertation, Theses, Books, Souvenir, Conference Proceeding with ISBN.  International E-Bulletin: Information/News regarding: Academics and Research

Effects of Exposure to Mainstream Media in Changing Political Behavior and Party Affiliation a Case Study of University of Gujrat, Pakistan

Author Affiliations

  • 1Centre for Media and Communication Studies, University of Gujrat, Post code 50700 Gujrat, Punjab, PAKISTAN
  • 2 Leadership and Management Studies, National Defense University, Post code 4400 Islamabad, PAKISTAN

Int. Res. J. Social Sci., Volume 2, Issue (12), Pages 29-34, December,14 (2013)

Abstract

This research reveals the role of mainstream media in Changing Political Behavior and Party Affiliationamong University of Gujrat students. The students of University of Gujrat devour media for different purpose as well as political information. Mostly students’ use television for political information most because it is attractive and famous medium nowadays. For this survey research conducted to investigate the media effects on changing behavior. Results explore that media have a power to change the voting behavior of viewers and it also persuades them towards new political parties. Media present issues to its audience with an effect that public forms opinion according to media’s emphasis on issue.

References

  1. Pasek J., Kate K., Daniel R. andYouth and Community Engagement:Media Is Related to Civic Activityin 14- to 22-Year-Olds, Communication115, DOI: 10.1177/0093650206287073 (2006)
  2. Galston W. A., Civic educationCollege Park, MD: AmericanAssociation, (2004)
  3. Delli Carpini M.X., Gen.Com:and the new informationCommunication, 17, 341-349 (2000)
  4. Delli Carpini M. X. and Keeterabout politics and why it matters,University Press, (1996)
  5. McLeod J.M., Rush R.R. andmedia and political informationOpinion Quarterly, 32(4), 575
  6. Chaffee S.H., Jackson-Beeck Mass Communication in PoliticalRenshon (Ed.), New York: Political socialization New York:Free Press, Handbook of Political socialization 223-258 (1977)
  7. lyengar S. and Kinder D.R., News that matters: Agenda setting and priming in a television age, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, (1987)
  8. McCombs M.E, and Donald L.S., The Emergence of American Political IssuesNew York. West Publishing Co, (1977)
  9. Klapper J.T., The effects of mass communications, Glencoe: III: Free Press,(1960)
  10. Roberts D.F. and Maccoby N., Effects of mass communication. In Lindzey, G. and Aronson, E. (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology, New York: Random House, 539- 598 (1985)
  11. Chaffee S. and Frank S., How Americans get political information: Print versus broadcast news, Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 546,48-58 (1996)
  12. Strömberg D., Radio’s Impact on Public Spending, Quarterly Journal of Economics,119(1), 189-221 (2004)
  13. McCombs M.E. and Shaw D.L., The agenda setting function of mass media, Public Opinion Quarrer/T, 36,176-85 (1972)
  14. Baran S.J. and Davis D.K., Mass communication theory: foundations, ferment, and future (5th edition), Boston, M.A.: Wadsworth Cengage learning(2009)
  15. Kinder D.R. and Sanders L.M., Mimicking political debate with survey questions: The case of white opinion onaffirmative action for blacks, Social Cognition, 8, 73-103, (1990)
  16. Fairhurst G. and Star R., The art of Framing, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, (1996)
  17. Deetz S. A., Tracy S.J. and Simpson J.L., Leading organizations, Through TransitionLondon, Thousand Oaks: Sage, (2000)
  18. Fellegi I.P., Survey Methods and Practices, Occasional, Ottawa Canada, Catalogue no. 12-587-X, ISBN 978-1-100-16410-6, (2003)
  19. Entman R.M., Framing: Toward clarication of a fractured paradigm, Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58 (1993)