6th International Young Scientist Congress (IYSC-2020) will be Postponed to 8th and 9th May 2021 Due to COVID-19. 10th International Science Congress (ISC-2020).  International E-publication: Publish Projects, Dissertation, Theses, Books, Souvenir, Conference Proceeding with ISBN.  International E-Bulletin: Information/News regarding: Academics and Research

Strength and performance evaluation of Nepalese RC bridge pier using non-linear dynamic response analysis through mathematical modelling

Author Affiliations

  • 1Nepal Engineering College, Bhaktapur, Nepal
  • 2Nepal Engineering College, Bhaktapur, Nepal
  • 3Nepal Engineering College, Bhaktapur, Nepal

Res. J. Engineering Sci., Volume 9, Issue (1), Pages 7-18, January,26 (2020)

Abstract

During the 1989 Loma Pita Earthquake (M 7.1) in California, widespread damage was reported to the region′s highway and bridges. Five different condition of Bridge pier have been considered with investigation of all the data base of Department of Road (DOR). Available bore-hole soil database of the bridge have been utilized. The analysis showed mat me KL tnagc Pier is safer in the event of earthquakes for simulating the ground conditions encircling the pier. The performance of the RC Bridge Pier was accessed in strong ground motion records. In this study it was intended to access the seismic performance of RC bridge piers under Gazali strong motion. It was observed in the field observation that most of the bridges in Kathmandu Valley were having lowered bed due to scouring. The effect of strong vertical ground motion was investigated for possible reduction in flexural and shear strength of the pier. For this purpose, fifteen models have been developed. These fifteen models are grouped into three sets. First set consists of the five models having only horizontal direction of earthquake is applied. Second set consists of five models with horizontal & Vertical direction of earthquake is applied and third Set consist of the five models with Scouring is considered. These studies have revealed that have got profound effect on the performance of the RC structures. The lateral extent of soil mass for each of the five different bridges were fixed based on trial computations until the percentage difference in consecutive response quantities were found within the limit of 0.4%. The lateral extent for the AO is fixed as 400m, AW is fixed as 500m, AP is fixed as 400m, IP is fixed z 500m and BPIs fixed as 400m. The light damage, considerable damage and also failure damage of the Bridge pier at different bridges for different cases (AO, AW, AP and BP). The introduction of strong vertical ground motion increase the vertical displacement by 48% all bridges. It means horizontal ground acceleration (0.71g) and vertical ground acceleration (1.37g) both applied horizontal displacement increases as well as vertical displacement increases. The Nepalese RC Bridge Pier (In 1990-2015) is over safe. The Nepalese RC Bridge Pier (After 2000 and Before 1990) is designed under safe.

References

  1. Whitman R.V., Bielak J. and Rosenblueth E. (1980)., Design earthquake resistant structures: foundations., Ed. E. Rosenblueth, Pentech Press, Inglaterra.
  2. Tadanobu S. (2000)., Dynamic Analysis and Earthquake Resistant Design., Volume 2: Method of Dynamic Analysis, JSCE, Oxford & IBH Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi, 172-201.
  3. Yadav R. (2017)., Inspection and maintenance design of steel bridge., international journal of bridge engineering, 5(1), 11-20.
  4. Kramer S.L. (1996)., Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering., Pearson Education (Singapore) Pte. Ltd., Indian Branch, Delhi, 280-303.
  5. Marwa M., Hassan M. ASCE, Angel Lence, Tyson Rupnow M. ASCE and Adam Zayor (2014)., Best practices for preventative maintenance against mold and mildew growth of concrete bridge elements.,
  6. Kim K. and Park T. (2016)., Analysis of Evaluation Indicators for Service Performance of Roads/Bridges.,
  7. Dubey R.K. (2018)., Optimal mesh density for fem analysis of a bridge deck under self-weight and dynamic vehicular loads., International journal of bridge engineering, 6(3), 1-17.
  8. Okamura H. and Maekawa K. (1991)., Nonlinear Analysis and Constitutive Models of Reinforced Concrete., Gihado Shuppan Co., Tokyo.
  9. Heydarpour P., Silva P.F. and Burgueño R. (2018)., An Incremental Dynamic Analysis on RC Bridge Columns Designed for P-Delta Effects According to Caltrans SDC., International Journal of Structural and Civil Engineering Research, 7(2).
  10. Cervenka V. (2002)., Computer Simulation of Failure of Concrete Structures for Practice., 1st Fib Congress 2002 concrete structures in 21st century, Osaka, Japan, and Keynote lecture in session 13, 289-304.
  11. Images for http://www.globalcitymap.com/nepal/images/ nepal-administrative-map.gif, undefined, undefined
  12. Justin Johnson and Tripathi R.K. (2019)., A Comparative study on design capacity of a deck slab using irc 112-2011 and aashto lrfd.,
  13. Proske D. (2019)., Comparison of the collapse frequency and the probability of failure of bridges., In Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Bridge Engineering, Thomas Telford Ltd., 172(1), 27-40.
  14. Raghav Sundria and Tripathi R.K. (2019)., Effect of skewness on reinforced concrete slab bridge by finite element.,
  15. Desnerck P., Lees J.M., Valerio P., Loudon N. and Morley C.T. (2018)., Inspection of RC half-joint bridges in England: analysis of current practice., In Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Bridge Engineering, Thomas Telford Ltd, 171(4), 290-302.
  16. Gupta T. and Kumar M. (2017)., Structural Response of Concrete Skew Box-Girder Bridges., International Journal of Bridge Engineering, 5(1), 37-59.
  17. Gao Z., Liang R.Y. and Patnaik A.K. (2017)., Probabilistic lifetime performance and structural capacity analysis of continuous reinforced concrete slab bridges., International Journal of Advanced Structural Engineering, 9(3), 231-245.