9th International Science Congress (ISC-2019).  International E-publication: Publish Projects, Dissertation, Theses, Books, Souvenir, Conference Proceeding with ISBN.  International E-Bulletin: Information/News regarding: Academics and Research

Response of Cabbage (Brassica Oleracea) Under Variable Irrigation and Lateral Spacing

Author Affiliations

  • 1Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, SHIATS, Allahabad, Uttar Pradesh, INDIA
  • 2 Faculty of Engineering and Technology, SHIATS, Allahabad, Uttar Pradesh, INDIA
  • 3 Department of Soil Water Land Engineering and Management, SHIATS, Allahabad, Uttar Pradesh, INDIA

Res. J. Engineering Sci., Volume 2, Issue (10), Pages 1-9, October,26 (2013)


In order to evaluate the effect of irrigation levels (50, 75, 100, 125 and 150 % of pan evaporation replenishment) and lateral spacing (0.5 m and 1.0 m) on marketable yield, irrigation production efficiency and economic return of cabbage under drip irrigation system and semi arid climate, a field experiment was conducted at the Irrigation Research Farm of Allahabad, India. The study was carried out during the winter crop growing season of 2012-2013 (Nov. to March) on clay loam soil. The highest mean marketable yield of cabbage (84.14 t/ha) during crop growing season was recorded when irrigation was applied at 125 % of pan evaporation replenishment with laterals in every rows and 0.5 m lateral spacing (LS1). A further increase in irrigation amount resulting from 150% of pan evaporation replenishment reduces the marketable yield significantly. Irrigation at 50% of pan evaporation replenishment gave the higher irrigation production efficiency of 38.33 kg/m3 with LS irrigation method. Minimum irrigation production efficiency was recorded with 150 % of pan evaporation replenishment (9.29 kg/m3) with laterals in alternate rows and 0.5 m lateral spacing (LS1) because it increases seasonal water applied considerably but decreases the marketable yield. Irrigation at 125 % of pan evaporation replenishment and 0.5 m lateral spacing (LS1) resulted in higher gross return (705066 Rs/ha), net return (633496 Rs/ha) and benefit cost ratio (9.84). In spite of higher initial investment, irrigation level of 125 % of pan evaporation replenishment and LS1 drip irrigation method is highly profitable for cabbage production in the region..


  1. Amer A.M., Evaluation of surface irrigation as a function of water infiltration in cultivated soils in the Nile Delta, Irrigation and Drainage Systems,25(4), 367-383 (2011)
  2. Ghamarnia H. and Gholamian M., The effect of saline shallow ground and surface water under deficit irrigation on (Carthamus tinctorius L.) in semi arid condition, Agric. Water Manage,118, 29-37 (2013)
  3. Imtiyaz M., Mgadla N.P., Chepet B. and Manase S.K.,Marketable yield, water use efficiency an decobomicreturn of cabbage, carrot an donion as influenced by irrigation schedules, Proc. of international Agricultral Engineerngcoference, Asian institute of technology, Bangkok, 312 (2000d)
  4. Azevedo L.P. de. and Saad J.C.C., The use of two drippers spacing in the same lateral line, their effects on the soil wet bulb and radish physical parameters, [Portuguese] IRRIGA, 17(2), 148-167 (2012)
  5. Tiwari K N. and Reddy K.Y., Economic analysis of trickle irrigation system considering planting geometry, Agric. Water Manage, 34, 195-206 (1998)
  6. Badr A.E., Abuarab M.E., Soil moisture distribution patterns under surface and subsurface drip irrigation systems in sandy soil using neutron scattering technique, Irrig. Sci.31(3), 317-332. 19 (2013)
  7. Mgadla N.P., Imtiyaz M. and Chepte B., Wheat production as influenced by limited irrigation paper No.-2, Department of Agricultural Research, Botswana, 22 (1995)
  8. Imtiyaz M., Mgadla N.P., Chepet K. and Mothobi E.O., Yield and economic return of vegetables crops under variable irrigation, Irrig. Sci. 1987-1993 (2000a)
  9. Imtiyaz M., Mgadla N.P. and Manase, S.K., Response of green mealies to water levels under sprinkler and drip irrigation. Proc. Of International Agricultural Engineering Conference, Asian Institute of Technology, Bangkok, 343-350 (2000e)
  10. Imtiyaz M., Saroha N. and Alam M.A., Marketable yield, irrigation production efficiency and economic return of onion under variable irrigation and lateral spacing. Proceedings of the International Agricultural Engineering Conference, Bangkok, Thailand (2007)
  11. Thakur B.C. and Spehia R.S., Studies on effect of drip lateral spacing and population density on yield of cauliflower (Brassica oleracea L. var. botrytis) under drip irrigation. International Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 1(1), 72-74. 7 (2005)
  12. Imtiyaz M., Mgadla N.P., Chepete B. and Manase S.K., Response of six vegetable crops to irrigation schedules, Agric. Water Manage,45, 331-342 (2000b)
  13. Mahadi M., Kaisi A.I., Berrada A. and Stack M., Evaluation of irrigation scheduling programme and spring wheat yield response in South Western Colorado, Agric. Water Manage, 34, 37-148 (1997)
  14. Boesveld H., Zisengwe L.S. and Yakami S., Drip Planner Chart: a simple irrigation scheduling tool for smallholder drip farmers. Irrigation and Drainage Systems,25(4), 323-333. 28 (2011)
  15. Al-Ghobari H.M. and El-Marazky M.S.A., Surface and subsurface irrigation systems wetting patterns as affected by irrigation scheduling techniques in an arid region. African Journal of Agricultural Research,7(44), 5962-5976. 38 (2012)
  16. Thakur M.C., Lal S. and Joshi A., Effect of different training systems and spacing on yield and quality characters and its impact on economics of tomato production, Horticultural Journal, 18(1), 64-68 15 (2005)
  17. James L.D. and Lee R.R., Economic of water resources planning M. C-Graw Hill, New Delhi, 20 (1971)
  18. Imtiyaz M., Mgadla N.P., Manase S.K., Chendo K. and Mothobi E.O., Yield and economic return of vegetable crops under variable irrigation, Irrig. Sci.,19, 87-93 (2000a)
  19. Dingre S.K., Pawar D.D. and Kadam K.G., Productivity, water use and quality of onion (Allium cepa) seed production under different irrigation scheduling through drip, Indian Journal of Agronomy,57(2), 186-190 (2012)
  20. Enciso J.M., Colaizzi P.D. and Multer W.L., Economic analysis of subsurface drip irrigation lateral spacing and installation depth for cotton, Transactions of the ASAE,48(1), 197-204.28 (2005)
  21. Wanga D., Kang Y. and Wana S., Effect of soil matric potential on tomato yield and water use under drip irrigation condition, Agric. Water Manage, 87, 180186 (2007)
  22. Imtiyaz M., Srivastava S.K. and Alam M.A., Yield and economic return of tomato as influenced by irrigation schedules and lateral spacing Proceedings of the 10thInternational Agricultural Engineering Conference, Bangkok, Thailand (2009)