Comparative study of phosphorus sorption characteristics and behaviours of Kilimanjaro-Pumice and Rungwe-Pumice wetland soils
- 1Department of Environmental Engineering, P.O Box 35176, Ardhi University, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
Int. Res. J. Environment Sci., Volume 7, Issue (8), Pages 8-15, August,22 (2018)
Kilimanjaro-Pumice and Rungwe-Pumice soils are potential media for phosphorus removal in constructed wetlands. The characteristics and behaviours of these soils in phosphorus sorption were carried in batch experiments at laboratory scale by which three varied sizes of Kilimanjaro-Pumice and Rungwe-Pumice soils were tested. For the phosphorus sorption isotherms, the findings reveal that Kilimanjaro soil has high ability in sorbing phosphorus compared to Rungwe-Pumice soil. The capacities for the Kilimanjaro-Pumice and Rungwe-Pumice soils in phosphorus sorption were 2.50 and 2.20 grams Phosphorus per kilogram of soil, respectively. For finer (1-2mm) and courser (4-8mm) particle sizes; about fifty percent of sorption in Kilimanjaro soil occurred in the 18th and 20th hour, correspondingly, while for Rungwe-Pumice soil, it occurred in the 17th and 18th hour, correspondingly. They were no significant influence of temperature on sorption of phosphorus for the finer particle when compared to 2-4mm and 4-8mm particle sizes. Both Kilimanjaro-Pumice and Rungwe-Pumice soils have good capacity in reducing phosphorus from wastewater. They are suggested to be utilized as constructed wetlands soils for removal of phosphorus.
- Headley T.R., Huett D.O. and Davison L. (2001)., The removal of nutrients from plant nursery irrigation runoff in subsurface horizontal-flow wetlands., Water Sci. Technology, 44(11-12), 77-84.
- Mahenge A.S. (2014)., Suitability of Moshi Pumice for Phosphorus Sorption in Constructed Wetlands., Journal of Applied Sciences and Environmental Management, 18(1), 135-140.
- Braskerud B.C. (2002)., Factors affecting Phosphorus retention in small constructed wetlands treating agricultural non-point source pollution., Ecological Engineering, 19, 41-61.
- Grüneberg B. and Kern J. (2001)., Phosphorus retention capacity of iron-ore and blast furnace slag in subsurface flow constructed wetlands., Water science and technology, 44(11-12), 69-75.
- Njau K.N., Minja R.J.A. and Katima J.H.Y. (2003)., Pumice soil: A potential wetland soil for treatment of domestic wastewater., Water Sci.& Technology, 48(5), 85-92.
- APHA, AWWA and WEF (2012)., Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater., Washington, DC, 1-1360. ISBN 978-087553-013-0
- Dunne E.J., Culleton N., O'Donovan G., Harrington R. and Daly K. (2005)., Phosphorus retention and sorption by constructed wetland soils., Water Research, 39(18), 4355-4362.
- Kumar V.K., Subanandam K., Ramamurthi V. and Sivanesan S. (2004)., GAC Sorption Process: Problems and Solutions., http://www.eco-web.com/edi/040319.html. 25 March 2012
- Mng, Suitability of pumice (Kilimanjaro-Pumice) soils for wastewater treatment in subsurface flow constructed wetland (SSFC)., Unpublished MSc. Dissertation, University of Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
- Molle P., Liénard A., Grasmick A. and Iwema A. (2003)., Phosphorus retention in subsurface constructed wetlands: investigations focused on calcareous materials and their chemical reactions., water science and technology, 48(5), 75-83.
- Rustige H., Tomac I. and Höner G. (2003)., Investigations on phosphorus retention in subsurface flow constructed wetlands., Water science and technology, 48(5), 67-74.
- Naja G. and Volesky B. (2006)., Behavior of the mass transfer zone in a biosorption column., Environmental science & technology, 40(12), 3996-4003.
- Zhu T., Maehlum T., Jenssen P.D. and Krogstad T. (2003)., Phosphorus sorption characteristics of a light-weight aggregate., Water Science and Technology, 48(5), 93-100.
- Metcalf F. and Eddy J. (2003)., Wastewater Engineering, Treatment, Disposal and reuse., Tata and McGraw-Hill Pub, India.