6th International Young Scientist Congress (IYSC-2021) and workshop on Intellectual Property Rights on 8th and 9th May 2021.  10th International Science Congress (ISC-2020) will be Postponed to 8th and 9th December 2021 Due to COVID-19.  International E-publication: Publish Projects, Dissertation, Theses, Books, Souvenir, Conference Proceeding with ISBN.  International E-Bulletin: Information/News regarding: Academics and Research

Engineered Nanoparticles (ENPs) in the Aquatic Environment: A Review

Author Affiliations

  • 1Department of Environmental Sciences, Jahangirnagar University, Savar, Dhaka-1342, Bangladesh

Int. Res. J. Environment Sci., Volume 5, Issue (3), Pages 75-79, March,22 (2016)


Environmental behavior of engineered nanoparticles (ENPs) is an emerging area of research. Due to the widespread utilization and huge amount of production, ENPs will inevitably end up into the environment such as water and soil through waste disposal and unintentional release. So they are vital environmental concerns because they are more toxic and chemically active per unit mass than their bulk counterparts. But environmental fate and behavior of ENPs presents a crucial obstacle in developing a holistic view of the fate and transport of nanomaterials within the environment and therefore environmental exposure. With respect to the aquatic environment, most nanomaterials interact with natural organic matter (NOM) and other materials found in the aqutic systems that influence the fate and transport of ENPs in water and may also be of significance for their effects on biological systems. This review addresses the better understanding of environmental behavior and fate of ENPs in aquatic environments and their physical and chemical characteristics with toxicity factors.


  1. Matranga V. and Corsi I. (2012)., Toxic effects of engineered nanoparticles in the marine environment: Model organisms and molecular approaches., Marine Environmental Research, 76, 32-40.
  2. Shah V. (2010)., Environmental impacts of engineered nanoparticles., Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 29(11), 2389–2390.
  3. Xiao X., Fan F-R.F., Zhou J. and Bard A.J. (2008)., Current transients in single nanoparticle collision events., Journal of American Chemical Society, 130, 16669–166.
  4. Deng Y-q., White J.C. and Xing B-s. (2014)., Interactions between engineered nanomaterials and agricultural crops: implications for food safety., Journal of Zhejiang University-Science A Applied Physics and Engineering, 15(8), 552-572.
  5. Maurer-Jones M.A., Gunsolus I.L., Murphy C.J. and Haynes C.L. (2013)., Toxicity of Engineered Nanoparticles in the Environment., Analytical Chemistry, 85(6), 3036–3049.
  6. Lee B.T. and Ranville J.F. (2012)., The effect of hardness on the stability of ci¬trate-stabilized gold nanoparticles and their uptake by Daphnia magna., Journal of Hazardous Materials, 213-214, 434-439.
  7. Bae S., Hwang Y.S., Lee Y.J. and Lee S.K. (2013)., Effects of water chemistry on ag¬gregation and soil adsorption of silver nanoparticles., Environmental Health and Toxicology, 28, 1-7.
  8. Hristozov D. and Malsch I. (2009)., Hazards and Risks of Engineered Nanoparticles for the Environment and Human Health., Sustainability, 1, 1161-1194.
  9. Bernhardt S.E., Colman B.P., Hochella M.F., Cardinale B.J., Roger M., Nisbet R.M. and Richardson C.R. and Yin L. (2010)., An Ecological Perspective on Nanomaterial Impacts in the Environment., Journal of Environmental Quality, 39, 1-12.
  10. British Standards Institution (2007)., Terminology for nanomaterials, PAS,, 136.
  11. Dorobantu S.L., Fallone C., Noble A.J., Veinot J., Ma G., Goss G.G. and Burrell R.E. (2015)., Toxicity of silver nanoparticles against bacteria, yeast, and algae., Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 17, 172.
  12. Migowski P. and Dupont J. (2007)., Catalytic applications of metal nanoparticles in imidazoliumionic liquids., Chemistry, 13, 32–39.
  13. Auffan M., Rose J., Bottero J-Y., Lowry G. V., Jolivet J-P. and Wiesner M.R. (2009)., Towards a definition of inorganic nanoparticles from an environmental, health and safety perspective., Nature Nanotechnology, 4, 634–641.
  14. Sajid M., Ilyas M., Basheer C., Tariq M., Daud M., Baig N. and Shehzad F. (2015)., Impact of nanoparticles on human and environment: review of toxicity factors, exposures, control strategies, and future prospects., Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 22, 4122–4143.
  15. Dobias J. and Bernier-Latmani R. (2013)., Silver release from silver nanoparti¬cles in natural waters., Environmental Science and Technology, 47(9), 4140-4146.
  16. Nangia S. and Sureshkumar R. (2012)., Effects of nanoparticle charge and shape anisotropy on translocation through cell membranes, Langmuir,, 28, 17666–17671.
  17. Stark W.J. (2011)., Nanoparticles in biological systems., Angewandte Chemie International Edition in English, 50, 1242–1258.
  18. Chowdhury I., Hong Y. and Walker S.L. (2010)., Container to characterization: impacts of metal oxide handling, preparation, and solution chemistry on particle stability. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects,, 368, 91–95.
  19. Liu J., Legros S., Ma G., Veinot J.G., von der Kammer F. and Hofmann T. (2012)., Influence of surface functionalization and particle size on the aggregation kinetics of engineered nanoparticles., Chemosphere, 87, 918–924.
  20. Nason J.A., McDowell S.A. and Callahan T.W. (2012)., Effects of natural organic matter type and concentration on the aggregation of citrate-stabilized gold nanoparticles., Journal of Environmental Monitoring, 14, 1885–1892.
  21. Buffle J., Wilkinson K.J., Stoll S., Filella M. and Zhang J. (1998)., A Generalized Description of Aquatic Colloidal Interactions: The 3-colloidal component approach., Environmental Science and Technology, 32, 2887–2899.
  22. He F., Wang W., Moon J.W., Howe J., Pierce E.M. and Liang L. (2012)., Rapid removal of Hg(II) from aqueous solutions using thiol-functionalized Zn-doped biomagnetite particles., ACS Applied Materials and Interfaces, 4, 4373–4379.
  23. Mueller N.C. and Nowack B. (2008)., Exposure modeling of engineered nanoparticles in the environment., Environmental Science and Technology, 42, 4447–4453.
  24. Gottschalk F., Sonderer T., Scholz R.W. and Nowack B. (2010)., Possibilities and limitations of modeling environmental exposure to engineered nanomaterials by probabilistic material flow analysis., Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 29, 1036–1048.
  25. Lowry G.V., Gregory K.B., Apte S.C. and Lead J.R. (2012)., Transformations of nanomaterials in the environment., Environmental Science and Technology, 46(13), 6893−6899.
  26. Ju-Nam Y. and Lead J.R. (2008)., Manufactured nanoparticles: an overview of their chemistry., interactions and potential environmental problems, Science of the Total Environment, 400, 396-414.
  27. Popov A.P., Priezzhev A.V., Lademann J. and Myllylä R. (2005)., TiO2 nanoparticles as an effective UV-B radiation skin-protective compound in sunscreens., Journal of Physics D Applied Physics, 38, 2564–2570.
  28. Gottschalk F., Sonderer T., Scholz R.W. and Nowack B. (2009)., Modeled environmental concentrations of engineered nanomaterials (TiO2, ZnO, Ag, CNT, Fullerenes) for different regions., Environmental Science and Technology, 43, 9216–9222.
  29. Kiser M.A., Westerhoff P., Benn T., Wang Y., Perez-Rivera J. and Hristovski K. (2009)., Titanium nanomaterial removal and release from wastewater treatment plants., Environmental Science and Technology, 43, 6757–6763.
  30. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Nanotechnology White Paper (2015)., U.S. EPA: Washington, DC, USA, 2007, Available online: http://www.epa.gov/osa/pdfs/ nanotech/epa-nanotechnology-whitepaper-0207.pdf. accessed 10 September 2015).
  31. Colvin V. (2003)., The potential environmental impact of engineered nanoparticles., Journal of Nature Biotechnology, 21, 1166-1170.
  32. Yin Y., Liu J. and Jiang G. (2012)., Sunlight-induced reduction of ionic Ag and Au to metallic nanoparticles by dissolved organic matter., ACS Nano, 6, 7910–7919.