6th International Virtual Congress (IVC-2019) And Workshop.  International E-publication: Publish Projects, Dissertation, Theses, Books, Souvenir, Conference Proceeding with ISBN.  International E-Bulletin: Information/News regarding: Academics and Research

Investigation of Proposed Infrastructure Developments in Beypore Port, using Rapid Impact Assessment Matrix (RIAM)

Author Affiliations

  • 1Department of Civil Engineering, Adithya Institute of Technology, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India
  • 2Department of Civil Engineering, University College of Engineering, Ramanathapuram, Tamil Nadu, India

Int. Res. J. Environment Sci., Volume 5, Issue (11), Pages 56-64, November,22 (2016)

Abstract

This research illustrates the environmental impact assessment of Beypore port infrastructure developments in Calicut. It examines and presents a translucent atmosphere with various parameters and alternatives as a result of RIAM Analysis, which considers all major components as follows: (PC) Physiochemical, (BE) Bioecological, (SC) Sociocultural and (EO) Economical- Operational. These components are then evaluated using a collective criteria common to all direct and indirect impacts concern. The reviewed impacts will be scaled using RIAM analysis. This matrix will be applied to the environmental impact assessment for the planned infrastructure developments at Beypore Port area. It will be shown that the development of Beypore Port region will have a tremendous optimistic effect economically and socially but a modest pessimistic effect with respect to Physiochemical and Bioecological components.

References

  1. Abdullahi Muhammad Abba, Aji A. Bukar and Amina Gimba (2016)., Environmental Impacts on Coastal Development in Penang, Malaysia Using Rapid Impact Assessment Matrix., Proceedings of the Academic Conference of Nightingale Publications & Research International on Sustainable Development, Federal University of Technology, Minna, Education Resource Centre Conference Hall, Niger State, Nigeria. March 31, 2(1), 1-12.
  2. Bindhu B.K., Mohan S. and Shibu K. (2012)., RIAM – An Effective Tool for Rapid Environmental Impact Assessment - A Case Study., 2012.
  3. Bisset R. (1998)., Developments in EIA Methods Environmental Impact Assessment - Theory and Practice., Unwin Hyman.
  4. Canter L.W. (1996)., Environmental Impact Assessment., McGraw-Hill Inc, Singapore.
  5. John Glasson, Riki Therivel and Andrew Chadwick (2005)., Introduction to Environmental Impact Assessment., Third Edition, the Natural and Built Environment Series, Rutledge, Abingdon, 2005.
  6. Guillemo Espinoza and Barabara Richards (2002)., Fundamentals of Environmental Impact Assessment., Trainers’ Course on Environmental Management and Assessment for Investment Projects, 2002.
  7. Hacking (2008)., Assessment of Environmental Impacts in Coastal Regions of Malaysia., Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 28(2), 73-89.
  8. Lawrence D.P. (1997)., The Need for EIA Theory-Building., Environmental Impact Assessments Review, 17, 79-107.
  9. Ogunba A. Oluseguti (2004)., EIA Systems in Nigeria: Evolution, Current Practice and Shortcomings., Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 24(6), 643- 660, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2003.10.019.
  10. Pastakia C.M. (1998)., The Rapid Impact Assessment Matrix (RIAM) - A New Tool for Environmental Impact Assessment., Environmental Impact Assessment Using the Rapid Impact Assessment Matrix (RIAM), Olsen & Olsen, Fredensborg, Denmark.
  11. Pope Jenny, Annandale David and A. Morrison-Saunders (2004)., Conceptualizing Sustainable Development Assessment., Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 24(6), 595-616, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2004.03.001
  12. Gabriel Dan Suditu and Brindusa Mihaela Robu Sluser (2012)., Digitization of the Environmental Impact Quantification Process., Environmental Engineering and Management Journal, 11(4), 841-848.
  13. Sarvamangala Praveena, SitiShapor Siraj, Ahmad Kimon Suleiman and Ahmad Zaharin Aris (2011)., A Brush up on Water Quality Studies of Port Dickson, Malaysia., Research Journal of Environmental Sciences, 5(12), 841-849, http://dx.doi.org/10.3923/rjes.2011.841.849
  14. Verheem R. (1992)., Environmental Assessment at the Strategic Level in the Netherlands., Project Appraisal, 7(3), 150-156.
  15. Wilkins H. (2003)., The Need for Subjectivity in EIA: Discourse as a Tool for Sustainable Development., Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 23(4) 401-414, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0195-9255(03)00044-1