6th International Virtual Congress (IVC-2019) And Workshop.  International E-publication: Publish Projects, Dissertation, Theses, Books, Souvenir, Conference Proceeding with ISBN.  International E-Bulletin: Information/News regarding: Academics and Research

Assessment of aquatic Ecological health of three sites on Slacks Creek, Queensland, Australia using surface Macro invertebrates

Author Affiliations

  • 1Griffith University, Department of Environmental Science, 170 Kessels Rd, Queensland 4111, AUSTRALIA

Int. Res. J. Environment Sci., Volume 3, Issue (11), Pages 6-13, November,22 (2014)


The health of a river depends much on its riparian zone which is strategically positioned to lend them the capacity to influence aquatic processes. Plant communities in riparian zones provide adequate food resources for both terrestrial and aquatic consumers. The species diversity and richness is important for the health of the stream. The objective of the study was to make comparison of the ecological health status of three sites SC01, SC02 and SC03 of Slacks Creek, Queensland Australia which had different riparian conditions. The three sites had different riparian vegetation conditions. Surface water macro invertebrates were sampled at the three sites using standardized AusRivAS protocols. Both riparian vegetation condition and hydraulic characteristics were found to affect the abundance and richness of macro invertebrates in urban areas. Site SC01 and SC02 had relatively high oxygen concentration compared to SC03 whose water was not flowing. The pooled data established 12 taxa consisting of 258 individuals from the 9 samples. Specifically, SC03 had 8 taxa while SC01 and SC02 had 3 and 6 respectively and a Margalef Richness index of 0.64, 0.98 and 0.79 for SC01, SC02 and SC03 respectively. The three sites indicated some similarity at least as demonstrated by Bray Curtis Similarity indicator but SC03 was more dissimilar than the other two. The taxa found in the three sites were comparable with those established by South-east Queensland Ecosystem Health Monitoring Program (EHMP) studies. Site SC03 showed high macro invertebrates taxa richness, as it was a nutrient-poor water body and it was highly covered by submerged vegetation. Site SC02 had no riparian vegetation rehabilitation work had not prevented sediments from reaching the creek thus had higher nutrients accounting for less taxa. Site SC01 showed unexpected result of minimum taxa compared with site SC02, due to the canalization of the stream in upstream which leads to sediment transport to this site. This study showed that aquatic health of urban streams can be improved by providing them with buffering riparian vegetation.


  1. Kendy E., C. Apse, and K. Blann, A practical guide to environmental flows for policy and planning, (2012)
  2. Tharme R.E., A global perspective on environmental flowassessment: Emerging trends in the development and application of Environmental flow methodologies for rivers, River Research Applications, 19, 397-441 (2003)
  3. Kennard M.J. et al., Are alien fish a reliable indicator of river health?, Freshwater Biology, 50, 174-193 (2005)
  4. Böhmer J. et al., Macrozoobenthos communities and biocoenotic assessment of ecological status in relation to degree of human impact in small streams in southwest Germany, Journal of Aquatic Ecosystem Stress and Recovery, 8(3), 407-419 (2001)
  5. Sheldon F. et al., Identifying the spatial scale of land use that most strongly influences overall river ecosystem health score(2012)
  6. Gregory S.V. et al., An Ecosystem Perspective of Riparian Zones : Fucus on links between land and water, Bioscience, 41(8), (1991)
  7. Naiman R.J. and H. Decamps, The ecology of interfaces : Riparian Zones, Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 28, 621-658 (1997)
  8. Hession W.C. et al., Ecological benefits of riparian reforestation in urban watersheds: Study design and preliminary results, Environmenal Monitoring and Assessment, 63, 211-220 (2000)
  9. Groffman, P., A. Dorsey, and P. Mayer,N processing within geomorphic structures in urban streams, J North Am Benthol Soc., 24, 613-625 (2005)
  10. Greenway M., The role of macrophytes in nutrient removal using constructed wetlands, in Bioremediation-A novel Technology, S.N. Singh and R.D. Tripathi, Editors., National Botanic Research Institute : Lucknow, India, (2006)
  11. Meyer J.L., Paul M.J. and Taulbee W.K., Stream ecosystem function in urbanizing landscapes.J. North Am Benthol Soc.,24, 602-612 (2005)
  12. Walsh C.J. et al., Effects of urbanization on streams of the Melbourne region, Victoria. Australia. I. Benthic macroinvertebrate communities, Fresh Water Biology,46, 535-551 (2001)
  13. Groffman P. et al., Soil nitrogen cycle processes in urban riparian zones, Environ Sci Technol, 36, 4547-4552(2002)
  14. Walsh C. et al., The urban stream syndrome: current knowledge and the search for a cure, J. North Am Benthol Soc, 24, 706-723 (2005)
  15. Bernhardt, E.S. and M.A. Palmer, Restoring streams in an urbanizing world, Freshwater Biology, 52, 738-751(2007)
  16. Jonsson M. et al., Simulating species loss following perturbation : Assessing the effects on process rates, The Royal Society, 269, 1047-1052 (2002)
  17. Midgley G.F., Biodiversity and Ecosystem Function.Science, 335, 174-175 (2012)
  18. Australian Government, Queensland Australian River Assessment System (AusRivAS) Sampling and Processing Manual, August 2001, Queensl and Department of Natural Resources and Mines, Editor, (2001)
  19. Clarke K.R. and Gorley R.N., Primer v6 user manual, PRIMER-E, Editor, Plymouth, (2006)
  20. Gamito S., Caution is needed when applying Margalef diversity index, Ecological Indicators, 10, 550-551 (2010)
  21. Clarke K.R., Somerfield P.J., and Chapman M.G., On resemblance measures for ecological studies, including taxonomic dissimilarities and a zero-adjusted Bray–Curtis coefficient for denuded assemblages, Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 330, 55-80(2006)
  22. Ludwig J.A. and Reynolds J.F., Cluster Analysis, in Statistical Ecology : A primer on methods and computing, 1988, John Wiley and Sons : New York, 189-202, (1988)
  23. Beals E.W., Bray-Curtis Ordination : An Effective Strategy for Analysis of Multivariate Ecological Data, in Elsevier Science and Technology, 1-55 (1984)
  24. Simpson E.H., Measurement of diversity, Nature, 163, 688(1949)
  25. Shannon C.E. and Weaver W., The Mathematical Theory of Communication, The University of Illinois Press, Illinois, (1963)
  26. Shannon C., A mathematical theory of communication, Bell Systems Technological Journal, 27, 379-423 (1948)
  27. Sheldon F. and K.F. Walker, Spatial distribution of littoral invertebrates in the lower Murray-Darling River system, Australia, Marine Freshwater Research, 49, 171-182 (1998)
  28. DERM, EPP Water-Monitoring and Sampling Manual 2009, Environment Protection (Water) Policy 2009, Version 1, Department of Environment and Heritage Protection, Editor,(2009)
  29. Tsyrlin, E. and J. Gooderham, The waterbug book: A guide to the freshwater macroinvertebrates of temperate australia, Melbourne: CSIRO Publishing, (2002)
  30. Sehar S. et al., Reduction of contaminants (Physical, Chemical, and Microbial) in domestic wastewater through hybrid constructed wetland, ISRN Microbiology, 1-9 (2013)
  31. Newham M.J., Fellows C.S., and Sheldon F., Functions of riparian forest in urban catchments : A case study from sub-tropical Brisbane, Australia, Urban Ecosyst, 14, 165-180 (2011)
  32. Vermonden K. et al., Urban drainage systems: An undervalued habitat for aquatic macroinvertebrates, Biological Conservation, 142(5), 1105-1115 (2009)
  33. Akaahan T.J.A., Studies on Benthic Fauna as Bio Indicators of Pollution in River Benue at Makurdi, Benue State, Nigeria, International Research Journal of Environment Sciences, 3(7), 33-38 (2014)
  34. Dirat M. et al., Ichtyofaunal Diversity of the Rigth bank of Congo River (Pool Malebo), Congo. International Research Journal of Environment Sciences,3(2), 36-47(2014)
  35. Grimm N.B. et al., Global change and the ecology of cities, Science,319, 756-760 (2008)
  36. McKinney M.L., Urbanization as a major cause of biotic homogenization, Biological Conservation, 127, 247-260(2006)
  37. Savard J.L., Clergeau P. and Mennechez G., Biodiversity concepts and urban ecosystems, Landscape and Urban Planning, 48, 131-142 (2000)