Abiotic factors influencing the diversity and abundance of protozoans at two different stations of Devika stream in Udhampur district, J&K, India
- 1Department of Zoology, University of Jammu, Jammu-180006, India
- 2Department of Zoology, University of Jammu, Jammu-180006, India
- 3Department of Zoology, University of Jammu, Jammu-180006, India
Int. Res. J. Biological Sci., Volume 8, Issue (9), Pages 32-38, September,10 (2019)
Two different study sites of Devika stream were analysed for a period of one year (Oct, 2014 to Sept, 2015), in order to estimate the effect of various changing physico-chemical parameters on the diversity and abundance of inhabitant protozoans. During the present investigation, qualitatively, a total of 10 genera and 13 species viz. Centropyxis aculeata, C. ecornis, Paramecium aurelia, P. trichium, Vorticella sps., Epistylis plicatilis, Campanella umbellaria, Euplotes sps., Bursaridium schewakofii, Difflugia lebes, D. acuminata, Arcella vulgaris, Colpidium sps. were enlisted; out of which, only 6 genera showed their presence at Station II. Quantitative estimation revealed higher protozoan count at Station I (i.e:- 68.96%) than at station II. This may be attributed to the presence of comparatively higher levels of water temperature, free carbon-dioxide, sulphates, phosphates, nitrates, BOD as well as lower levels of DO at Station I. Furthermore, presence of some of the species like Epistylis plicatilis, Euplotes sps., Bursaridium schewakofii, Difflugia lebes and Arcella vulgaris at Station I infers to more anthropogenic influence at this station and also due to direct organic input. This organic load gets further diluted while travelling towards station II and seems less detrimental from the present data.
- Murugan N., Murugavel P. and Kodarkar M.S. (1998)., Cladocera: The biology, classification, identification and ecology., Indian Association of Aquatic Biologists (IAAB), Hyderabad, 1-47.
- Rocha O., Matsumura-Tundisi T., Espindola E.L.G., Roche K.F. and Rietzler A.C. (1999)., Ecological theory applied to reswervoir zooplankton., In: Theoretical reservoir ecology and its application (Eds.: J.G. Tundisi and M.Straskraba). Internat, Inst. Ecol., Sao Carlos, 457-476.
- Dadhick N. and Saxena M.M. (1999)., Zooplankton as indicators of trophical status of some desert water near Bikanar., J. Environ. Pollut., 6, 251-254.
- Pawar D.H. (2012)., Physico-chemical status of the water of historical lakes and tanks in Kolhapur city., Review of Research, 1, 1-4.
- A.P.H.A. (1985)., Standard methods for the examination of water and waste water., American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association and Water Pollution Control Federation, Washington, D.C., 1198.
- Edmondson W.T. and Weinberg G.G. (1971)., A manual on productivity in Freshwaters., Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, 358.
- Pennak R.W. (1978)., Fresh water invertebrates of United States., 2nd edition. A Wiley- Interscience Publication.
- Adoni A.D. (1985)., Workbook on Limnology., Pratibha Publishers, C-10 Gour Nagar Sagar, India.
- Shukla U. and Gupta P.K. (2001)., Assemblage of ciliated protozoan community in a polluted and non-polluted environment in a tropical lake of central Himalaya: Lake Naini Tal, India., Journal of Plankton Research, 23(6), 571-584.
- Salvado H. and Gracia M.P. (1991)., Response of ciliate population to changing environmental conditions along a fresh water reservoir., Arch. Hydrobiol., 123, 239-255.
- Gupta S., Kour S. and Kaur H. (2015)., Seasonality of invertebrate fauna inhabiting lower Shiwalik stream, Philodinavus paradoxus- the first report., Golden Research Thoughts, 4(7), 1-8.
- Chander M.V. (2017)., Status of animal resources in relation to Hydro-biological variables in Chenani hydroelectric reservoir and its feeding channel., Ph. D Thesis, University of Jammu, Jammu.