International E-publication: Publish Projects, Dissertation, Theses, Books, Souvenir, Conference Proceeding with ISBN.  International E-Bulletin: Information/News regarding: Academics and Research

The Nutritional value of Beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) and its importance for Feeding of Rural communities in Puebla-Mexico

Author Affiliations

  • 1Centro de Agroecología del Instituto de Ciencias de la Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla, MÉXICO
  • 2 Escuela de Ingeniería Agroforestal de la Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla, MÉXICO

Int. Res. J. Biological Sci., Volume 2, Issue (8), Pages 59-65, August,10 (2013)

Abstract

The bean is one of the most important crops in the country and occupies the second crop sowing in how much space in the state of Puebla; allegedly, it was introduced in America by nomadic tribes who crossed the Bering Strait to Alaska. There is evidence that in the tenth century the Aztecs in Mexico used the beans as a staple grain, and the Incas were introduced to South America. Globally, the bean is the most important food legume for nearly 300 million people, what, most of them live in developing countries, due to the crop is also known as "the meat of the poor"; in addition, food is a little expensive for low-income consumers. The bean is considered as the second source of protein in eastern and southern Africa, and the fourth in America, it is especially important in the nutrition of women and children; in addition, it has great economic importance, as it generates income for millions of small farmers, to such a degree that the world annual production is aboutUS$11 billion. As in Mexico, in Central America, the cowpea crop goes back to the pre-columbian era. For cultural reasons and its high nutritional value, the bean is considered a staple grain to the diet of the people of Central America, and is the main source of protein in rural communities.

References

  1. Juhi M., Rattan D.S., Vikas S.J. and Manju G.A., Assessment of phenolic components and antioxidative activities of Phaseolus vulgaris L. International Journal of Integrative Biology,9(1), 26-30 (2010)
  2. Pérez F.Y. and Ferrera R., Diversidad genética y patología del frijol. Colegio de Postgraduados, Chapingo, Estado de México, 111 (1994)
  3. Flores D.L., González Q., Álvarez T. Y. De Lachica F., El escenario geográfico. Recursos Naturales, Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia, México, D.F. (1974)
  4. Carrasco P. La sociedad mexicana antes de la conquista, In: Historia general de México, El Colegio de México, D.F. 165-286 (1981)
  5. Aguilar B.G., Peña V., García N.J.R., Ramírez V.P., Benedicto V.G., Molina G.J., Rendimiento de frijol Phaseolus vulgaris L.) En relación con la concentración de vermicompost y déficit de humedad en el sustrato. Agrociencia, 46(1), 37-50 (2012)
  6. Velazquez R.C., Peña V.B., Luna C.M. and Aguirre J.R., Seed morphological characterization and reserves used during seedling emergency of wild and domesticated common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.), Rev. Fac. Agron., 27(1), 61-87 (2010)
  7. Anónimo, La producción de frijol en México: Diversidad y libre mercado, In: Claridades Agropecuarias. Editorial Abriendo Surcos, México, 1-22 (2005)
  8. Miranda C.S., Origen de Phaseolus vulgaris L. (Frijol común), Agrociencia,1(1) 99-109 (1967)
  9. Anónimo, Manual de producción de frijol (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) en el estado de Puebla, Secretaría de Desarrollo Rural, Puebla, Pue. 50 (2007)
  10. Miranda C.S., Origen de Phaseolus vulgaris . (frijol común), Agrociencia,1(2), 99-109 (1967b)
  11. Voysest O.L. and Fernández F.C., Mejoramiento de frijol por introducción y selección, CIAT Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical, Colombia 32 (1986)
  12. Anónimo, Morfología de la planta de frijol común; Guía de estudio para ser usada como complemento de la Unidad Audi tutorial, Cali, Colombia, 50 (1982)
  13. Anónimo, Regionalización de las provincias agronómicas para el cultivo de frijol en el Estado de Puebla, México (1991)
  14. Debouck D.G., Problemática reciente de la domesticación del frijol, Conferencia presentada en el CAEVAMEX - INIFAP, Estado de México, 18 (1987)
  15. Solorzano V.E., El cultivo de frijol (Phaseolus vulgarisL.). Ed. Univ. De Chapingo, México, 81 (1994)
  16. Balkaya A. and Odabas M.S., Determination of the seed characteristics in some significant snap bean varieties grown in Samsun, Turkey, Pak. J. Biol. Sci.,5(1) 382-387 (2002)
  17. Hernández X.F., Ramos R.Y. Martínez M.A., Etnobotánica, Contribución al Conocimiento del frijol Phaseolus vulgaris L) en México, M.E. Engleman eds. Colegio de Posgraduados de Chapingo, México. (1979)
  18. Ríos M.J., El Frijol (Phaseolus vulgaris L.), Cultivo, beneficio y variedades, Boletín Técnico, Colombia, Bogotá, 193 (2002)
  19. Pérez M.J., Ferrera E.Y. García R. Diversidad Genética y Patología del Frijol, Colegio de Postgraduados en Ciencias Agrícolas, Montecillo, Estado de México, 2-18 (1994)
  20. Anuario estadístico de la producción nacional de granos básicos, INEGI, (2010)
  21. Boik J., Natural Compounds in Cancer Therapy, Oregon Medical Press, LLC. Princeton, Minnesota USA, 251-267 (2001)
  22. Duke J.A., Bogenschutz-Godwin M.J., du Cellier J., Duke P.K., Handbook of Medicinal Herbs, 2a. Ed. CRC Press New York, USA (2002)
  23. Duke J., A.Y. Ayensa E.S., Medicinal Plants of China. Reference Publications, Algonac, MI (1985)
  24. Rocha-Guzman N.E., Gallegos-Infante JA. Antioxidant activity in Cotyledon of Black and Yellow Common beans Phaseolus Vulgaris L), Res. J. Biol. Sci., 2(1), 112-117 (2007)
  25. Weiss R.F., Fintelmann V. Herbal Medicine. 2a. ed. Pub. Thieme Stuttgart, New Cork, USA, 128-129 (2000)
  26. Oomah B.D. and Cardador M.A., Phenolics and antioxidative activities in common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L). J. Sci. Food Agric., 85, 935-942 (2005)
  27. González de Mejía E., Hanzkins C.N., Paredes L.O. y Shannon A.M., The Lectins and Lectins-Like Proteins of tepary beans (Phaseolusacutifolius) and Tepary-Common bean (Phaseolusvulgaris) Hybrids, J. FoofBiochem., 14,117-126 (1990)
  28. Rafi M.M., Vastano B.C. Novel polyphenol molecule isolated from licorice root (Glycrrhizaglabra) induces apoptosis, G2/M cell cycle arrest, and Bcl-2 phosphorylation in tumor cell lines, J. Agric. Food Chem., 50, 677-684 (2002)
  29. Blumenthal M., Busse WR, Goldberg A., Grenwald J., Hall T., Riggins CW., Rister RS. The Complete German Comission E Monographs-Therapeutic Guide to Herbal Medicines. Ed. American Botanical Council, Pub. Integrative Medicine Communications, Boston. Mass. USA. 157 (1998)
  30. Servicio de Información Agroalimentaria y Pesquera, México. SAGARPA (2010)