A study on the selected invertebrate fauna in Tal Chhapar Wildlife sanctuary of Churu district, Rajasthan, India
- 1University School of Environment Management, GGS Indraprastha University, 16C, Dwarka, New Delhi 110078, India
- 2University School of Environment Management, GGS Indraprastha University, 16C, Dwarka, New Delhi 110078, India
- 3University School of Environment Management, GGS Indraprastha University, 16C, Dwarka, New Delhi 110078, India
Res. J. Agriculture & Forestry Sci., Volume 8, Issue (1), Pages 57-61, January,8 (2020)
The current study deals with the inventory of invertebrate fauna in Tal Chhapar Wildlife Sanctuary (TWS) carried out from 2015-2017 following visual encounter search for selected invertebrate classes namely Odonata (dragonflies and damselflies), Arachnida (spiders) and Lepidoptera (butterflies and moths). The study resulted in documentation of 9 species of Odonata (6 dragonflies and 3 damselflies), 13 species of spiders and 24 species of Lepidoptera (19 butterflies and 5 moths). Libellulidae was found to be the most dominant family among Odonates. Similarly Lycosidae family had the highest species count among spiders. In the Lepidoptera group, Lycaenidae family showed the highest species richness. This study provides comprehensive information about the invertebrate fauna of TWS, especially covering those groups which were earlier not documented. This information can be used for effective management and conservation strategies.
- Stork N.E., McBroom J., Gely C. and Hamilton A.J. (2015)., New approaches narrow global species estimates for beetles, insects and terrestrial arthropods., Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 112(24), 7519-7523.
- Whiles M.R. and Charlton R.E. (2006)., The ecological significance of tall grass prairie arthropods., Annual Review of Entomology, 51, 387-412. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ento.51.110104.151136
- Daily G.C., Alexander S., Ehrlich P.R., Goulder L., Luchenco J., Matson P.A., Mooney H.A., Postel S., Schneider S.H., Tilman D. and Woodwell G.M. (1997)., Ecosystem services: benefits supplied to human societies by natural ecosystems., Issues in Ecology, 2, 1-16.
- Yen A.L. and Butcher R.J. (1997)., An overview of the conservation of non-marine invertebrates in Australia., Environment Australia, Canberra, Australia.
- Kellert S.R. (1993)., Values and perceptions of invertebrates., Conservation Biology, 7(4), 845-855.
- Bale J.S., Masters G.J., Hodkinson I.D., Awmack C., Bezemer T.M. and Brown V.K. (2002)., Herbivory in global climate change research:direct effects of rising temperature on insect herbivores., Global Change Biology, 8, 1-16. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2486.2002.00451.x
- Rosenberg D.M., Danks H.V. and Lehmkuhl D.M. (1986)., Importance of insects in environmental impact assessment., Environmental Management, 10(6), 773-783.
- Editor-Director (2009)., Faunal Resources of Tal Chhapar Wildlife Sanctuary, Churu., Rajasthan Series, 38, 1-66. ISBN: 978-81-8171-209-7
- Rodgers W.A, Panwar H.S. and Mathur V.B. (2002)., Wildlife Protected Area Network in India: A Review (Executive Summary)., Wildlife Institute of India, Dehradun, 36.
- Champion H.G. and Seth S.K. (1968)., A Revised Survey of the Forest Types of India., Government of India, New Delhi.
- Nawar K. (2015)., Floristic and ethnobotanical studies of Ramgarh Vishdhari wildlife sanctuary of Bundi (Rajasthan)., Doctoral dissertation, University of Kota, Rajasthan.
- Poonia S. and Rao A.S. (2018)., Climate and climate change scenarios in the Indian Thar desert., In: Leal Filho, W (ed.) Handbook of Climate Change Resilience. Springer Nature Switzerland AG, 1-14.
- Tikader B.K. (1980)., Fauna of India - Araneae: Spider, Vol. I. (Aranidae and Gnaphosidae)., Zoological Survey of India, 448.
- Tikader B.K. (1980)., Fauna of India - Araneae: Spiders, Vol. II. Part-1 (Thomisidae)., Zoological Survey of India, 1-247.
- Tikader B.K. and Biswas B. (1981)., Spider fauna of Calcutta and its vicinity part I., Records of the Zoological Survey of India, 30, 1-149.
- Sebastian P.A. and Peter K.V. (2009)., Spiders of India., Orient Blackswan, Hydrabad, India, 734.
- World Spider Catalogue (2016)., Natural History Museum Bern., online at http://wsc.nmbe.ch,version 17.0, accessed on 28th January 2016.
- Bell T.R.D. and Scott F.B. (1937)., Fauna of British India including Ceylon and Burma (Moths)., Taylor & Francis, London, V, 1-537.
- Hampson G.F. (1892)., Fauna of British India including Ceylon and Burma (Moths)., Taylor & Francis, London, I, 1-527.
- Hampson G.F. (1894)., Fauna of British India including Ceylon and Burma (Moths)., Taylor & Francis, London, II, 1-609.
- Hampson G.F. (1895)., Fauna of British India including Ceylon and Burma (Moths)., Taylor & Francis, London, III, 1-546.
- Hampson G.F. (1896)., Fauna of British India including Ceylon and Burma (Moths)., Taylor & Francis, London, IV, 1-594.
- Kehimkar I. (2008)., The Book of Indian Butterflies., Bombay Natural History Society, Mumbai, 497.
- Kunte K., Roy P., Kalesh S. and Kodandaramaiah U. (2015)., Butterflies of India, v. 2.10. Indian Foundation for Butterflies., http://www.ifoundbutterflies.org/ home Accessed on 27th January 2015.
- Fraser F.C. (1933)., The fauna of British India including Ceylon and Burma., Odonata, Vol. I. London: Taylor and Francis Ltd.
- Fraser F.C. (1934)., The fauna of British India including Ceylon and Burma., Odonata, Vol. II. London: Taylor and Francis Ltd.
- Fraser F.C. (1936)., The fauna of British India including Ceylon and Burma., Odonata, London: Taylor and Francis Ltd., 3, 146-149.
- Mitra T.R. (2006)., Handbook on common Indian dragonflies (Insect:Odonata)., Kolkata: Zoological Survey of India.
- Subramanian K.A. (2009)., Dragonflies of India: a field guide., India:Vigyan Prasar.
- Adjaloo M.K., Oduro W. and Mochiah M.B. (2012)., Spatial distribution of insect assemblage in cocoa farms in relation to natural forest., Journal of Applied Biosciences, 54, 3870- 3879.
- McKinney M.L. (2002)., Urbanization, Biodiversity, and Conservation:The impacts of urbanization on native species are poorly studied, but educating a highly urbanized human population about these impacts can greatly improve species conservation in all ecosystems., BioScience, 52(10), 883-890.