6th International Young Scientist Congress (IYSC-2020) will be Postponed to 8th and 9th May 2021 Due to COVID-19. 10th International Science Congress (ISC-2020).  International E-publication: Publish Projects, Dissertation, Theses, Books, Souvenir, Conference Proceeding with ISBN.  International E-Bulletin: Information/News regarding: Academics and Research

Vermicomposting Efficiency and Quality of Vermicompost with Different Bedding Materials and Worm Food Sources as Substrate

Author Affiliations

  • 1College of Agriculture, Laguna State Polytechnic UniversitySiniloan Campus, Siniloan, Laguna, PHILIPPINES

Res. J. Agriculture & Forestry Sci., Volume 4, Issue (1), Pages 1-13, January,8 (2016)

Abstract

Vermicomposting is a simple environment-friendly technology that supports sustainable agriculture and waste management programs. It involves physical and biochemical action of earthworms in converting organic materials (usually wastes) into two useful products- the earthworm biomass and high quality organic fertilizer, the vermicompost. The efficiency of vermicomposting may be measured by the worm number and/or biomass and the vermicompost produced. To achieve high efficiency one of the keys is selection of proper substrate which is composed of bedding material and food source for the worms. A 3x3 factorial experiment with plant matter and animal manures as the factors was conducted to determine the efficiency of vermicomposting as indicated by worm biomass vermicompost produced. Data on worm number and weight, and vermicompost produced were collected and analyzed. A sample of vermicompost from each treatment was brought to soil laboratory for NPK analysis. It showed that the sawdust, among the plant materials, and hog manure, among the animal manures were the best materials for vermicomposting substrate. The worm number and total weight were highest in this combination. The individual weight and concentration of nutrients NPK were highest in G. sepium and chicken manure substrate. It is concluded that efficiency of producing worms and vermicompost is affected by the substrate materials and that it could be increased by selecting appropriate substrates.

References

  1. Rupani P.F., Mohd F. Md D. and Zelam D. Kanhere(2013)., Sustainable management of different organicwaste by vermicomposting technology, Journal of Agricultural Technology, 9(3) 529-539.
  2. Shrivastava S. and Singh K. (2013), Vermicompost to Save Our Agricultural Land. Research Journal ofAgriculture and Forestry Sciences, 1(4), 18-20.
  3. Pathma J. and Sakthivel N. (2012)., Microbial diversity of vermicompost bacteria that exhibit useful agricultural traits and waste management potential, SpringerPlus,1(26) 2-20.
  4. Munroe G. (2004), Manual of on-farm vermicomposting and vermiculture., http://www.organicagcentre.ca/ DOCs/Vermiculture_FarmersManual_gm.pdf September 15,2010-34
  5. Sinha R.K., Agarwal S., Chauhan K., Chandran V and Kiranbhai B. (2010), Vermiculture Technology: Reviving the Dreams of Sir Charles Darwin for Scientific Use of Earthworms in Sustainable Development Programs, Technology and Investment, 1, 155-172.
  6. Latifah A.M., Mohd L.C., Mohd K.Y., Tengku H.,Tengku I., Rosta H., Hafizan J. and Kamaruzaman J.(2009)., Influences of Bedding Material in Vermicomposting Process, International Journal of Biology, 1(1) 81-91.
  7. Sivakumaran S. (2014), Biodegradation of Saw in Plant Fertilizer, Research Journal of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, 2(2), 13-19.
  8. Guerrero R.D. (2004), Handbook of Vermicompost and Vermimeal Production and Utilization, AquaticBiosystems, Laguna, Philippines, 1-42.
  9. Sinha R.K. (2008), Vermiculture and Sustainable Agriculture, American-Eurasian J. Agric. and Environ.Sci., (5) 01-55.
  10. Sivasankari B, Indumathi S. and Anandharaj M. (2013), A Study on life cycle of Earth worm Eudriluseugeniae.International Journal of Research in Pharmacy and Life Sciences, 1(2) 64-67.
  11. Sinha R.K., Herat A.S., Asadi R. and Carretero E.(2002), Vermiculture Technology for EnvironmentalManagement: Study of Action of Earthworms Eiseniafetida, Eudriluseuginiae and Perionyxexcavatuson Biodegradation of Some Community Wastes in India and Australia, The Environmentalist, 22(2), 261-268.
  12. Vasanthi K., Chairman K. and Ranjit Singh A.J.A.(2013), Influence of animal wastes on growth andReproduction of the African earthworm species Eudriluseugeniae (Kinberg), Poll Res., 32(2), 337-342.
  13. Daniel T., Sivasankari B. and Malathy M. (2010), Microbial and nutrient enhancement of Gliricidiasepiumand Leucaenaleucocephala leaf materials using Eiseniafetida, in Vermitechnology II, N. Karmegam, Ed.,4(1), 152–154.
  14. Esaivani C, Esakiammal B., Vasanthi K., Nithya R and Chairman K. (2015), Vermiconversion of leaf wastes (Ficusbenghalensis and Ficusracemosa) by employing Eudriluseugeniae, International Journal of Advanced Research, 3(8), 798–806.
  15. Rajendran P.E., Jayakumar S.K. and Gunasekaran P.(2008), Vermiculture and Vermicomposting Biotechnology for Organic Farming and Rural Economic Development, http://www.researchgate.net/publication/230641885.
  16. Jesikha M. and Lekshemanasamy M. (2012), Reproductive Performance of Eudriluseugeniae (Kingberg) in Pongamiapinnata Leaf Medium, International Interdisciplinary Research Journal,Volume-II, Issue-VI,
  17. Simons A.J. and Stewart J.L. (1998), Gliricidiasepium: A Multipurpose Forage Tree Legume in: Ross C.Gutteridge and H. Max Shelton Forage Tree Legumes in Tropical Agriculture, The Tropical Grassland Society of Australia Inc.
  18. Myung Ho Um and Youn Lee (2001), Quality Control for Commercial Compost in Korea, National Institute ofAgricultural Science and Technology (NIAST) Rural Development Administration (RDA), Suwon 441-707,Korea, -10-01.
  19. Dominguez J., Edwards C.A. and Ashby J. (2001), The biology and population dynamics of Eudriluseugeniae (Kinberg) (Oligochaeta) in cattle wastesolids, Pedobiologia, 45, 341–353.
  20. Pattnaik S. and Reddy M.V. (2010), Nutrient Status of Vermicompost of Urban GreenWaste Processed by Three Earthworm Species- Eiseniafetida, Eudriluseugeniae and Perionyx excavates, Applied and Environmental Soil Science, 20, 101-14.
  21. Gunadi B. and Edwards C.A. (2003), The effect of multiple applications of different organic wastes on the growth, fecundity and survival of Eiseniafoetida (Savigny) (Lumbricidae),Pedobiologia, 47(4), 321–330.
  22. Suthar S. (2007), Vermicomposting potential of Perionyx sansibaricus (Perrier) in different waste materials, Bioresource Technology, 98, 1231–1237.
  23. Vijaya T.M., Middha S.K.M., Usha T., Aruna H.K., Bharathi R., Saini Deepti and Govindaraj G. (2012),, Morphological and Histological Studies on the Vermicomposting Indian Earthworm Eudrilus eugeniae., World Journal of Zoology. 7(2), 165-170.
  24. Vorsters A., Demey F. and Hardouin J. (1997), Influence of worm density on the growth of Eudriluseuginiae.Tropicultura, 15(2), 89-90.
  25. Lange M.G., Baxter C. and Killian K. (2005), A comparison analysis of vermicomposting strategies infood substrates with an emphasis on nutrient values and reproduction, The Big M, 1, 1-14.
  26. Sriramulu A. and Govindarajan G. (2005), Bioconversion of Municipal Solid Waste by the EarthwormEudriluseugeniae (Kinberg), International Research Journal of Biological Sciences, 3(2), 70-73.
  27. Ndegwa P.M. and Thompson S.A. (2000), Effects of Cto-N ratio on vermicomposting of biosolids, ElsevierPublishing, Bioresource Technology, 75, 7-12.
  28. Sinha R.K., Hahn G., Singh P.K., Suhane R.K. and Anthony Reddy A. (2011), Organic Farming byVermiculture: Producing Safe, Nutritive and Protective Foods by Earthworms (Charles Darwin’s Friends ofFarmers), American Journal of Experimental Agriculture,1(4), 363-399.
  29. Mistry J., Mukhopadhyay A.P. and Baur G.N. (2015), Status of N P K in vermicompost prepared by twocommon weed and two medicinal plants, Journal of Advanced Studies in Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Sciences, 2(1), 25-38.
  30. Kanchilakshmi M., Arockiam T., Chandrasekar and Sumathi G. (2015), Earthworm Processed Weeds onPlant Growth Attributes, International Research Journal of Biological Sciences, 4(7), 24-28.