6th International Young Scientist Congress (IYSC-2020) will be Postponed to 8th and 9th May 2021 Due to COVID-19. 10th International Science Congress (ISC-2020).  International E-publication: Publish Projects, Dissertation, Theses, Books, Souvenir, Conference Proceeding with ISBN.  International E-Bulletin: Information/News regarding: Academics and Research

Economic Viability of Tectona grandis sole Cropping and Intercropping for 20 years Planting Project

Author Affiliations

  • 1Forest Plantation and Agroforestry Program, School of International Tropical Forestry, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, 88400 Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, MALAYSIA
  • 2Forest Plantation and Agroforestry Program, School of International Tropical Forestry, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, 88400 Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, MALAYSIA
  • 3School of Sustainable Agriculture, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Campus of Sandakan, Off Jalan Sg Batang, Miles 10, 90000 Sandakan, Sabah, MALAYSIA
  • 4Faculty of Agrobased Industry, Universiti Malaysia Kelantan, Jeli Campus, 17600 Jeli, Kelantan, MALAYSIA

Res. J. Agriculture & Forestry Sci., Volume 1, Issue (3), Pages 22-25, April, (2013)

Abstract

Economic viability of Tectona grandis sole cropping and intercropping for 20 years planting project were carried out at the Boonrich plantation in Lahad Datu, Sabah. The study was conducted to evaluate the economic viability and to compare between T. grandis sole cropping and intercropping of T. grandis with Salacca zalaca. The data of height, diameter, cost and prices were analysed. The parameter that used to measure the economic viability of the project were net present value (NPV), internal rate of return (IRR), benefit cost ratio (BCR), land equivalent ratio (LER), sensitivity analysis (SA) and payback period. The analysis was carried out by using Microsoft excel. From the study, the NPV of intercropping is RM27,063.70 (USD8,841.54), the LER is 1.37, 23.68% of IRR and have a shorter payback period (13 years) compare to the sole cropping. As a conclusion, the intercropping can give a higher profit to the company, not only that it has a shorter payback period than the sole cropping. In addition, it also showed a higher yield as the LER is more than one (1.37). Therefore, T. grandis intercrop with S. zalaca will gain extra benefit and greater output than the sole cropping.

References

  1. Chowdury M.Q., Rashid A.Z.M.M, and Afrad M.M., Growth performance of Teak (Tectona grandis Linn. F.)coppice under different regimes of canopy opening, Trop.Eco., 49(2), 245-250 (2008)
  2. Isabel M., Vicelina S., and Helena P., Wood properties ofteak (Tectona grandis) from a mature unmanged stand inEast Timor, Japan Wood Sci,. 57, 171-178 (2011)
  3. Ramesh U. and Jain C.K., , Agroforestry Systems andPractices. Edition 2010. India: Oxford Book Company,Jaipur (2010)
  4. Himanshu S.K., Kumar S., Kumar A. and Gupta K. K., Energy Economics Assessment of Crops in Traditional andMechanized Farming, Int. Res. J. Environment Sci., 1(5),27-34 (2012)
  5. Jafari E., Intellectual capital and its effects on firm’s marketvalue on financial performance in Iran: An investigatingPulic Model. Res. J. Recent Sci., 2(3), 1-6 (2013)
  6. Seyednezhadfahim S.R., Eghdami E., Yosefnezhad S. andMaleki M., Investigating the Procedure of Financial Factorsin Successful Companies, Res. J. Recent Sci., 2(3), 44-48(2013)
  7. Klemper W.D., Forest Resource Economics and Finance, W.D. Klemperer, Blacksburg (2003)
  8. Brigham E.F., Houston J.F., Chiang Y.M., Lee H.S., andAriffin B., Essentials of Financial Management 2nd Edition, Singapore: Cengage Learning Asia Pte Ltd (2010)
  9. Ajayi O.C, Akinnefesi F.K, Sileshi G, and Kanjipite G., Labour inputs and financial profitability of conventionaland agro-based soil fertility management practices inZambia, Agrekon, 48(3), 276-292 (2009)
  10. Esmaeili A, Sadeghpour A, Hosseini S.M.B, Jahanzad E,Chaichi M.R, and Hashemi M., Evaluation of seed yieldand competition indices for intercropped barley (Hordeumvulgare) and annual medic (Medicago scutellata), Int. J. ofPlant Prod., 5(4), 395-404 (2011)
  11. Mead R., and Willey R.W., The concept of a LandEquivalent Ratio and Advantages in yield fromIntercropping, Experimental Agric., (16), 217-228 (1980)
  12. Mazaheri D., Madani A., and Oveysi M., Assessing TheLand Equivalent Ratio (LER) of Two Corn [Zea mays L.]Varieties Intercropping at Various Nitrogen Levels InKaraj, Iran, J. Central European Agric., 7(2), 359-364(2006)
  13. Ng’ang’a M.N., Ohiokpehai O., Muasya R.M., and OmamiE., Intercropping Grain Amaranth (Amaranthus dubius)with Soybean (Glycine max) for sustainability andImproved Livelihoods in Western Kenya, In: Bationo, A.Waswa, B. Okeyo, J.M. Maina, F. and Kihara, J. (Eds.) In:Innovations as Key to the Green Revolution in Africa, (1).Springer Link. (2006)
  14. Nawazish M, Ayesha A, Syed Kumail A. R. and Bushra N., Can Current Earnings Predict Future Cash Flows? ALiterature Survey, Res. J. Recent Sci., 2(2), 76-80 (2013)
  15. Rasoul B. H., Samad T. Karim E and Shima K., EvaluatingEffects of Financial Leverage on Future Stock Value atStock Exchange. Res. J. Recent Sci., 2(2), 81-84 (2013)
  16. Van Asten P.J.A., Wairegi L.W.I., Mukasa D., and UringiN.O., Agronomic and economic benefits of coffee-bananaintercropping in Uganda’s smallholder farming systems, Agric. Syst., 104, 326 – 334 (2011)